Evidence mapPaperPMID 19557149Full record

ArticleThe open cardiovascular medicine journal2009

Implementation of guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. The impulsion study.

Asterios Karagiannis, Apostolos I Hatzitolios, Vasilios G Athyros, Kalliopi Deligianni, Charalambos Charalambous, Christos Papathanakis, Georgios Theodosiou, Theodoros Drakidis, Veronika Chatzikaloudi, Chysanthi Kamilali and 7 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The open cardiovascular medicine journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02887677 phase4terminatedstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Study of the Effects of Dapagliflozin on Ambulatory Aortic Pressure, Arterial Stiffness and Urine Albumin Excretion in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Ran2016Enrolled85Registered outcomes9Posted comparisons0ConditionsDiabetes MellitusArmsdapagliflozin, Placebo
Open the trial in the graph
NCT00416611 completednot on this map

IMPlementation of gUideLines for the Management of Arterial hypertenSION. The IMPULSION Study

TypeobservationalSponsorHellenic Atherosclerosis SocietyRan2006 to 2007Enrolled1,000ConditionsHigh Blood PressureArmsImplementation of guidelines
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Are we getting to lipid targets in real life?Archives of medical science : AMS · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Asterios KaragiannisSecond Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippocration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Apostolos I Hatzitolios
Vasilios G Athyros
Kalliopi Deligianni
Charalambos Charalambous
Christos Papathanakis
Georgios Theodosiou
Theodoros Drakidis
Veronika Chatzikaloudi
Chysanthi Kamilali
Sotirios Matsiras
Athanasios Matziris
Christos Savopoulos
Maria Baltatzi
Jobst Rudolf
Konstantinos Tziomalos
Dimitri P Mikhailidis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed the effects of a pilot best practice implementation enhancement program on the control of hypertension. We enrolled 697 consecutive known hypertensive patients with other vascular risk factors but free from overt vascular disease. There was no "control" group because it was considered unethical to deprive high-risk patients from "best medical treatment". Following a baseline visit, previously trained physicians aimed to improve adherence to lifestyle measures and drug treatment for hypertension and other vascular risk factors. Both at baseline and at study completion (after 6 months), a 1-page form was completed showing if patients achieved treatment targets. If not, the reasons why were recorded. This program enhanced compliance with lifestyle measures and increased the use of evidence-based medication. There was a substantial increase in the number of patients who achieved treatment targets for blood pressure (p<0.0001) and other vascular risk factors. In non-diabetic patients (n=585), estimated vascular risk (PROCAM risk engine) was significantly reduced by 41% (p<0.0001). There was also a 12% reduction in vascular risk according to the Framingham risk engine but this did not achieve significance (p=0.07). In conclusion, this is the first study to increase adherence to multiple interventions in hypertensive patients on an outpatient basis, both in primary care and teaching hospitals. Simple, relatively low cost measures (e.g. educating physicians and patients, distributing printed guidelines/brochures and completing a 1-page form) motivated both physicians and patients to achieve multiple treatment goals. Further work is needed to establish if the improvement observed is sustained. [ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00416611].

Indexed as

best practicecontrolHypertensiontreatmentvascular risk factors.

Identifiers

PMID19557149
PMCPMC2701277

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.