Trial reportInternational journal of clinical practice2009
Saxagliptin added to a submaximal dose of sulphonylurea improves glycaemic control compared with uptitration of sulphonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in International journal of clinical practice, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It reports registered trial NCT00313313. Cited by 72 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin in Combination With Glyburide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control With Glyburide Alone
Open the trial in the graphWho cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 238 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gastric Neoplasm Risk with DPP-4 Inhibitors, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, and SGLT2 Inhibitors: Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and gallbladder or biliary disease in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Pooled it
- Insulin and glucose-lowering agents for treating people with diabetes and chronic kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on beta-cell function and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Scientific reports · 2017Pooled it
- Factors Related to the Glucose-Lowering Efficacy of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Focusing on Ethnicity and Study Regions.Clinical drug investigation · 2017Pooled it
- Addition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors to sulphonylureas and risk of hypoglycaemia: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2016Pooled it
- Cost effectiveness of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes.PharmacoEconomics · 2015Pooled it
- Clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c without hypoglycaemia: results across four studies of saxagliptin.International journal of clinical practice · 2013Pooled it
- Saxagliptin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: assessing cardiovascular data.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2012Pooled it
- Bioequivalence of saxagliptin/metformin extended-release (XR) fixed-dose combination tablets and single-component saxagliptin and metformin XR tablets in healthy adult Chinese subjects.Clinical drug investigation · 2014Trial
- Evaluation of pharmacokinetic drug interactions between gemigliptin (dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitor) and glimepiride (sulfonylurea) in healthy volunteers.Drugs in R&D · 2014Trial
- Long-term safety and tolerability of saxagliptin add-on therapy in older patients (aged ≥ 65 years) with type 2 diabetes.Clinical interventions in aging · 2014Trial
- Tolerability and efficacy of glycemic control with saxagliptin in older patients (aged ≥ 65 years) with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.Clinical interventions in aging · 2013Trial
- Pharmacokinetic study of saxagliptin in healthy Chinese subjects.Clinical drug investigation · 2012Trial
- Evaluating the Potential of Prevalent New User Design as an Alternative When New User Design is Impractical.Pragmatic and observational research · 2025Article
- Pancreatic beta-cell mass and function and therapeutic implications of using antidiabetic medications in type 2 diabetes.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2024Review
- DPP-4 inhibitors for treating T2DM - hype or hope? an analysis based on the current literature.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Review
- DPP-4 Inhibition and the Path to Clinical Proof.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019Review
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsAssess the efficacy and safety of saxagliptin added to a submaximal sulphonylurea dose vs. uptitration of sulphonylurea monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control with sulphonylurea monotherapy. METHODS AND PATIENTS: A total of 768 patients (18-77 years; HbA(1c) screening >or= 7.5 to <or= 10.0%) were randomised and treated with saxagliptin 2.5 or 5 mg in combination with glyburide 7.5 mg vs. glyburide 10 mg for 24 weeks. Blinded uptitration glyburide was allowed in the glyburide-only arm to a maximum total daily dose of 15 mg. Efficacy analyses were performed using ANCOVA and last-observation-carried-forward methodology.
resultsAt week 24, 92% of glyburide-only patients were uptitrated to a total glyburide dose of 15 mg/day. Saxagliptin 2.5 and 5 mg provided statistically significant adjusted mean decreases from baseline to week 24 vs. uptitrated glyburide, respectively, in HbA(1c) (-0.54%, -0.64% vs. +0.08%; both p < 0.0001) and fasting plasma glucose (-7, -10 vs. +1 mg/dl; p = 0.0218 and p = 0.002). The proportion of patients achieving an HbA(1c) < 7% was greater for saxagliptin 2.5 and 5 mg vs. uptitrated glyburide (22.4% and 22.8% vs. 9.1%; both p < 0.0001). Postprandial glucose area under the curve was reduced for saxagliptin 2.5 and 5 mg vs. uptitrated glyburide (-4296 and -5000 vs. +1196 mg.min/dl; both p < 0.0001). Adverse event occurrence was similar across all groups. Reported hypoglycaemic events were not statistically significantly different for saxagliptin 2.5 (13.3%) and 5 mg (14.6%) vs. uptitrated glyburide (10.1%).
conclusionSaxagliptin added to submaximal glyburide therapy led to statistically significant improvements vs. uptitration of glyburide alone across key glycaemic parameters and was generally well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.