ArticleInternational journal of diabetes in developing countries2008
Prescription of Aspirin for adults with Diabetes.
Article in International journal of diabetes in developing countries, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the prescription of aspirin for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disorders in diabetic patients, in the light of American Diabetes Association guidelines. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective analysis, presence of any cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular disease risk factor as defined in American Diabetes Association guidelines and the use of aspirin and other medication data were extracted from the case files of 100 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus visiting two teaching hospitals.
resultsOf 100 patients studied, 58% were men and 42% women and all were >/= 40 years of age. 45% had at least one cardiovascular disease and all (100%) were on aspirin for secondary prevention; 45% had one or more risk factors, of which 11% (05/45) had aspirin prescribed for primary prevention; remaining 10% had neither risk factors nor cardiovascular disease (but age >/= 40 years) and no aspirin documentation. Reasons for not using aspirin/antiplatelet drug were not recorded.
conclusionsAmerican Diabetes Association recommendations for aspirin use for secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases were strictly adhered to, in contrast to that for primary prevention. Under-prescription of aspirin could be attributed to the physicians' concern about the burden of poly-pharmacy and toxic effects of aspirin on long-term use. Extensive efforts are necessary to enhance aspirin use in this regard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.