Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19902154›Full record

ArticleDer Internist2009

[Prevention of stroke: what is evidence based?].

S Lüders, J Schrader

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Internist, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S LüdersSt. Josefs-Hospital, Krankenhausstrasse 13, 49661, Cloppenburg, Deutschland. s.lueders@kh-clp.de
J Schrader

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On the background of aging population an increase of patients suffering from stroke has to be expected during the next years and decades. Strokes are the 3rd leading cause of death and reason for disability in Germany and many other countries. An effective treatment of the modifiable risk factors hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, smoking, alcohol consumption, and adipositas is of enormous impact. Due to the linear relationship between blood pressure and risk of stroke, the treatment of hypertension is the most important and effective one in primary as well as in secondary prevention. Treatment with platelet inhibitors plays an additional important role in secondary prevention. Patients with atrial fibrillation should receive an effective oral anticoagulatory therapy when there are certain risk factors.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineHumansIncidenceRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStrokeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.