Evidence mapPaperPMID 19909929Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2009

Assessment of coronary plaque progression in coronary computed tomography angiography using a semiquantitative score.

Sam J Lehman, Christopher L Schlett, Fabian Bamberg, Hang Lee, Patrick Donnelly, Leon Shturman, Matthias F Kriegel, Thomas J Brady, Udo Hoffmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Plaque assessment by coronary CT.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sam J LehmanCardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Christopher L Schlett
Fabian Bamberg
Hang Lee
Patrick Donnelly
Leon Shturman
Matthias F Kriegel
Thomas J Brady
Udo Hoffmann
Harvard University · US

Funding

Cardiac MR and CT ResearchT32HL076136 · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · 2004 to 2005
$557k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL080053NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL076136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe sought to describe the progression of coronary atherosclerotic plaque over time by computed tomography (CT) angiography stratified by plaque composition and its association with cardiovascular risk profiles.

backgroundData on the progression of atherosclerosis stratified by plaque composition with the use of noninvasive assessment by CT are limited and hampered by high measurement variability.

methodsThis analysis included patients who presented with acute chest pain to the emergency department but initially showed no evidence of acute coronary syndromes. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced 64-slice CT at baseline and after 2 years with the use of a similar protocol. CT datasets were coregistered and assessed for the presence of calcified and noncalcified plaque at 1 mm cross sections of the proximal 40 mm of each major coronary artery. Plaque progression over time and its association with risk factors were determined. Measurement reproducibility and correlation to plaque volume was performed in a subset of patients.

resultsWe included 69 patients (mean age 55 +/- 12 years, 59% male patients) and compared 8,311 coregistered cross sections at baseline and follow-up. At baseline, any plaque, calcified plaque, and noncalcified were detected in 12.5%, 10.1%, and 2.4% of cross sections per patient, respectively. There was significant progression in the mean number of cross sections containing any plaque (16.5 +/- 25.3 vs. 18.6 +/- 25.5, p = 0.01) and noncalcified plaque (3.1 +/- 5.8 vs. 4.4 +/- 7.0, p = 0.04) but not calcified plaque (13.3 +/- 23.1 vs. 14.2 +/- 22.0, p = 0.2). In longitudinal regression analysis, the presence of baseline plaque, number of cardiovascular risk factors, and smoking were independently associated with plaque progression after adjustment for age, sex, and follow-up time interval. The semiquantitative score based on cross sections correlated closely with plaque volume progression (r = 0.75, p < 0.0001) and demonstrated an excellent intraobserver and interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.95 and kappa = 0.93, respectively).

conclusionsCoronary plaque burden of patients with acute chest pain significantly increases during the course of 2 years. Progression over time is dependent on plaque composition and cardiovascular risk profile. Larger studies are needed to confirm these results and to determine the effect of medical treatment on progression.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAcute DiseaseAdultAgedAngina PectorisCalcinosisCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID19909929
PMCPMC2796339
OpenAlexW1966694114

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.