Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20053273›Full record

Trial reportBMC neurology2010

Study protocol of the YOU CALL--WE CALL TRIAL: impact of a multimodal support intervention after a "mild" stroke.

Annie Rochette, Nicol Korner-Bitensky, Duane Bishop, Robert Teasell, Carole White, Gina Bravo, Robert Côté, Jean Lachaine, Teri Green, Louise-Hélène Lebrun and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Telerehabilitation services for stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. Information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. [Use of smartphone apps in secondary stroke prevention].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Annie RochetteMontreal University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. annie.rochette@umontreal.ca
Nicol Korner-Bitensky
Duane Bishop
Robert Teasell
Carole White
Gina Bravo
Robert Côté
Jean Lachaine
Teri Green
Louise-Hélène Lebrun
Sylvain Lanthier
Moira Kapral
Sharon Wood-Dauphinee
Université de Montréal · CAMcGill University · CASt. Vincent's Medical Center · USThe University of Texas at San Antonio · USUniversité de Sherbrooke · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore than 60% of new strokes each year are "mild" in severity and this proportion is expected to rise in the years to come. Within our current health care system those with "mild" stroke are typically discharged home within days, without further referral to health or rehabilitation services other than advice to see their family physician. Those with mild stroke often have limited access to support from health professionals with stroke-specific knowledge who would typically provide critical information on topics such as secondary stroke prevention, community reintegration, medication counselling and problem solving with regard to specific concerns that arise. Isolation and lack of knowledge may lead to a worsening of health problems including stroke recurrence and unnecessary and costly health care utilization.The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness, for individuals who experience a first "mild" stroke, of a sustainable, low cost, multimodal support intervention (comprising information, education and telephone support)--"WE CALL" compared to a passive intervention (providing the name and phone number of a resource person available if they feel the need to)--"YOU CALL", on two primary outcomes: unplanned-use of health services for negative events and quality of life. METHOD/

designWe will recruit 384 adults who meet inclusion criteria for a first mild stroke across six Canadian sites. Baseline measures will be taken within the first month after stroke onset. Participants will be stratified according to comorbidity level and randomised to one of two groups: YOU CALL or WE CALL. Both interventions will be offered over a six months period. Primary outcomes include unplanned use of heath services for negative event (frequency calendar) and quality of life (EQ-5D and Quality of Life Index). Secondary outcomes include participation level (LIFE-H), depression (Beck Depression Inventory II) and use of health services for health promotion or prevention (frequency calendar). Blind assessors will gather data at mid-intervention, end of intervention and one year follow up. DISCUSSION: If effective, this multimodal intervention could be delivered in both urban and rural environments. For example, existing infrastructure such as regional stroke centers and existing secondary stroke prevention clinics, make this intervention, if effective, deliverable and sustainable.

trial registrationISRCTN95662526.

Indexed as

Stroke RehabilitationCanadaClinical ProtocolsComorbidityDepressionFollow-Up StudiesHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Education as TopicPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesQuality of LifeResearch DesignStrokeTelemedicineTelephoneTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID20053273
PMCPMC2818655
OpenAlexW2026186499

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.