Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20069487›Full record

SynthesisErgonomics2010

Endurance time is joint-specific: a modelling and meta-analysis investigation.

Laura A Frey Law, Keith G Avin

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ergonomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Reliability and Validity of Gluteal Endurance Measures (GEMs).International journal of sports physical therapy · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Strength Decrease, Perceived Physical Exertion and Endurance Time for Backpacking Tasks.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura A Frey LawGraduate Program in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Keith G Avin

Funding

MULTICENTER CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR PHYSICAL AND OCCUPATIONAL THERAPYK12HD055931 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HAYES, MARCIE HARRIS · 2007 to 2021
$12.7M
Genetic and Trait Influences on Pain HeterogeneityK01AR056134 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI FREY LAW, LAURA A · 2009 to 2013
$587k
Assessing 3D Trunk Strength as a Function of Position and VelocityF31AR056175 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI AVIN, KEITH G · 2008 to 2011
$120k
NIAMS NIH HHS 1K01AR056134NIAMS NIH HHS F31 AR056175NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR056134NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Static task intensity-endurance time (ET) relationships (e.g. Rohmert's curve) were first reported decades ago. However, a comprehensive meta-analysis to compare experimentally-observed ETs across bodily regions has not been reported. We performed a systematic literature review of ETs for static contractions, developed joint-specific power and exponential models of the intensity-ET relationships, and compared these models between each joint (ankle, trunk, hand/grip, elbow, knee, and shoulder) and the pooled data (generalised curve). 194 publications were found, representing a total of 369 data points. The power model provided the best fit to the experimental data. Significant intensity-dependent ET differences were predicted between each pair of joints. Overall, the ankle was most fatigue-resistant, followed by the trunk, hand/grip, elbow, knee and finally the shoulder was most fatigable. We conclude ET varies systematically between joints, in some cases with large effect sizes. Thus, a single generalised ET model does not adequately represent fatigue across joints. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: Rohmert curves have been used in ergonomic analyses of fatigue, as there are limited tools available to accurately predict force decrements. This study provides updated endurance time-intensity curves using a large meta-analysis of fatigue data. Specific models derived for five distinct joint regions should further increase prediction accuracy.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaHumansJointsMuscle ContractionMuscle FatiguePhysical Endurance

Identifiers

PMID20069487
PMCPMC2891087

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.