Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20107198›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2010

Lack of suppression of circulating free fatty acids and hypercholesterolemia during weight loss on a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet.

Teri L Hernandez, Julie P Sutherland, Pamela Wolfe, Marybeth Allian-Sauer, Warren H Capell, Natalie D Talley, Holly R Wyatt, Gary D Foster, James O Hill, Robert H Eckel

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Reactive oxygen species: role in obesity and mitochondrial energy efficiency.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Nutrition therapy within and beyond gestational diabetes.Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Teri L HernandezUniversity of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA. teri.hernandez@ucdenver.edu
Julie P Sutherland
Pamela Wolfe
Marybeth Allian-Sauer
Warren H Capell
Natalie D Talley
Holly R Wyatt
Gary D Foster
James O Hill
Robert H Eckel
Temple University · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR025780 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2008 to 2011
$61.3M
NCRR NIH HHS 1 UL 1 RR 025780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the comparative effect of weight-loss diets on metabolic profiles during dieting.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the effect of a low-carbohydrate diet (< or =20 g/d) with a high-carbohydrate diet (55% of total energy intake) on fasting and hourly metabolic variables during active weight loss.

designHealthy, obese adults (n = 32; 22 women, 10 men) were randomly assigned to receive either a carbohydrate-restricted diet [High Fat; mean +/- SD body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)): 35.8 +/- 2.9] or a calorie-restricted, low-fat diet (High Carb; BMI: 36.7 +/- 4.6) for 6 wk. A 24-h in-patient feeding study was performed at baseline and after 6 wk. Glucose, insulin, free fatty acids (FFAs), and triglycerides were measured hourly during meals, at regimented times. Remnant lipoprotein cholesterol was measured every 4 h.

resultsPatients lost a similar amount of weight in both groups (P = 0.57). There was an absence of any diet treatment effect between groups on fasting triglycerides or on remnant lipoprotein cholesterol, which was the main outcome. Fasting insulin decreased (P = 0.03), and both fasting (P = 0.040) and 24-h FFAs (P < 0.0001) increased within the High Fat group. Twenty-four-hour insulin decreased (P < 0.05 for both groups). Fasting LDL cholesterol decreased in the High Carb group only (P = 0.003). In both groups, the differences in fasting and 24-h FFAs at 6 wk were significantly correlated with the change in LDL cholesterol (fasting FFA: r = 0.41, P = 0.02; 24-h FFA: r = 0.52, P = 0.002).

conclusionsWeight loss was similar between diets, but only the high-fat diet increased LDL-cholesterol concentrations. This effect was related to the lack of suppression of both fasting and 24-h FFAs.

Indexed as

Diet, Carbohydrate-RestrictedAdultCholesterol, LDLDietary CarbohydratesDietary FatsDiet, Fat-RestrictedDiet, ReducingEnergy IntakeFatty Acids, NonesterifiedFemaleHumansHypercholesterolemiaInsulinLipoproteinsMaleMiddle AgedCholesterol, LDLDietary CarbohydratesDietary FatsFatty Acids, NonesterifiedInsulinLipoproteinsTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID20107198
PMCPMC3132068
OpenAlexW2101988880

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.