Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20165898›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2010

In front of and behind the replication fork: bacterial type IIA topoisomerases.

Claudia Sissi, Manlio Palumbo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. DNA Cleavage Mediated by Bacterial Type II Topoisomerases.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. DNA Decatenation Catalyzed by Bacterial Topoisomerase IV.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Interactions between Gepotidacin andACS infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Design and Synthesis of Novel Antimicrobial Agents.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudia SissiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 5, 35131, Padua, Italy. claudia.sissi@unipd.it
Manlio Palumbo
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topoisomerases are vital enzymes specialized in controlling DNA topology, in particular supercoiling and decatenation, to properly handle nucleic acid packing and cell dynamics. The type IIA enzymes act by cleaving both strands of a double helix and having another strand from the same or another molecule cross the DNA gate before a re-sealing event completes the catalytic cycle. Here, we will consider the two types of IIA prokaryotic topoisomerases, DNA Gyrase and Topoisomerase IV, as crucial regulators of bacterial cell cycle progression. Their synergistic action allows control of chromosome packing and grants occurrence of functional transcription and replication processes. In addition to displaying a fascinating molecular mechanism of action, which transduces chemical energy into mechanical energy by means of large conformational changes, these enzymes represent attractive pharmacological targets for antibacterial chemotherapy.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiophysical PhenomenaCatalysisChromosomesDNADNA GyraseDNA ReplicationDNA Topoisomerase IVIsomerasesDNADNA GyraseDNA Topoisomerase IVIsomerases

Identifiers

PMID20165898
PMCPMC11115839
OpenAlexW1979474715

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.