Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20174954›Full record

ReviewProtoplasma2010

How the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii keeps time.

Thomas Schulze, Katja Prager, Hannes Dathe, Juliane Kelm, Peter Kiessling, Maria Mittag

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Protoplasma, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sensing a rainbow of colors: algal photoreceptors.Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Comparative Phenotyping of Two Commonly UsedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Chlamydomonas cell cycle.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Phase-resetting mechanism of the circadian clock in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. News about cryptochrome photoreceptors in algae.Plant signaling & behavior · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Multiple light inputs to a simple clock circuit allow complex biological rhythms.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2011
    Article
  15. Spotlight on post-transcriptional control in the circadian system.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2011
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas SchulzeInstitute of General Botany and Plant Physiology, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Am Planetarium 1, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Katja Prager
Hannes Dathe
Juliane Kelm
Peter Kiessling
Maria Mittag
Friedrich Schiller University Jena · DESchiller International University · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has two flagella and a primitive visual system, the eyespot apparatus, which allows the cell to phototax. About 40 years ago, it was shown that the circadian clock controls its phototactic movement. Since then, several circadian rhythms such as chemotaxis, cell division, UV sensitivity, adherence to glass, or starch metabolism have been characterized. The availability of its entire genome sequence along with homology studies and the analysis of several sub-proteomes render C. reinhardtii as an excellent eukaryotic model organism to study its circadian clock at different levels of organization. Previous studies point to several potential photoreceptors that may be involved in forwarding light information to entrain its clock. However, experimental data are still missing toward this end. In the past years, several components have been functionally characterized that are likely to be part of the oscillatory machinery of C. reinhardtii since alterations in their expression levels or insertional mutagenesis of the genes resulted in defects in phase, period, or amplitude of at least two independent measured rhythms. These include several RHYTHM OF CHLOROPLAST (ROC) proteins, a CONSTANS protein (CrCO) that is involved in parallel in photoperiodic control, as well as the two subunits of the circadian RNA-binding protein CHLAMY1. The latter is also tightly connected to circadian output processes. Several candidates including a significant number of ROCs, CrCO, and CASEIN KINASE1 whose alterations of expression affect the circadian clock have in parallel severe effects on the release of daughter cells, flagellar formation, and/or movement, indicating that these processes are interconnected in C. reinhardtii. The challenging task for the future will be to get insights into the clock network and to find out how the clock-related factors are functionally connected. In this respect, system biology approaches will certainly contribute in the future to improve our understanding of the C. reinhardtii clock machinery.

Indexed as

Chlamydomonas reinhardtiiCircadian ClocksProteomeSystems BiologyTime FactorsTranscription, GeneticProteome

Identifiers

PMID20174954
OpenAlexW2040372048

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.