Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20176719›Full record

ArticleEndocrinology2010

Variations in the response of pituitary lactotrophs to oxytocin during the rat estrous cycle.

Joël Tabak, Arturo E Gonzalez-Iglesias, Natalia Toporikova, Richard Bertram, Marc E Freeman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrinology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fast-activating voltage- and calcium-dependent potassium (BK) conductance promotes bursting in pituitary cells: a dynamic clamp study.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011
    Article
  7. Systemic oxytocin induces a prolactin secretory rhythm via the pelvic nerve in ovariectomized rats.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2011
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joël TabakDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, BRF 206, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA. joel@neuro.fsu.edu
Arturo E Gonzalez-Iglesias
Natalia Toporikova
Richard Bertram
Marc E Freeman
Florida State University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

REGULATION OF PROLACTIN SECRETION AT THE LACTOTROPHR01DK043200 · NIDDK · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BERTRAM, RICHARD, GONZALEZ-IGLESIAS, ARTURO EDUARDO · 1992 to 2014
$4.9M
CRCNS:Comput./Exp.Study:Hypothal.-Pituitary InteractionR01DA019356 · NIDA · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BERTRAM, RICHARD · 2004 to 2008
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS DA-19356NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019356NIDDK NIH HHS DK-43200NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK043200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although removal of dopamine inhibition is established as a major factor in prolactin (PRL) release, a large body of evidence suggests that hypothalamic oxytocin (OT) may serve as a PRL-releasing hormone in the rat. PRL release is modulated by estradiol (E2), which rises between diestrus and proestrus of the estrous cycle, causing a PRL surge in the afternoon of proestrus. Given that E2 strongly modulates OT actions in both central and peripheral tissues, OT action on lactotrophs might also be modulated by the stage of the estrous cycle. To test this hypothesis, we have monitored PRL release and intracellular calcium levels ([Ca(2+)](i)) induced by OT in pituitary lactotrophs obtained from female rats in either diestrus 1 or proestrus. We found that both secretory and [Ca(2+)](i) responses to OT are significantly increased in lactotrophs obtained on proestrus. Moreover, we show that these differences are due to an increase in both the number of OT-responding lactotrophs and the magnitude of their individual [Ca(2+)](i) responses. Both secretory and [Ca(2+)](i) responses were abolished by a specific OT antagonist. Finally, dose-dependent studies show that the increased PRL-releasing effect of OT on proestrus is significant over a wide range of concentrations, particularly those observed in hypophyseal portal plasma. These results suggest that the rising E2 titers that culminate on proestrus facilitate the stimulatory action of OT on lactotrophs and support the notion that OT is a PRL-releasing hormone with an important role in the production of the proestrous surge of PRL.

Indexed as

AnimalsArea Under CurveCalciumCells, CulturedDose-Response Relationship, DrugEstrous CycleFemaleLactotrophsOxytocinProlactinRadioimmunoassayRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyCalciumOxytocinProlactin

Identifiers

PMID20176719
PMCPMC2850224
OpenAlexW2151427311

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.