Evidence mapPaperPMID 20182862Full record

Trial reportDiabetologia2010

Sex differences in glucose levels: a consequence of physiology or methodological convenience? The Inter99 study.

K Faerch, K Borch-Johnsen, A Vaag, T Jørgensen, D R Witte

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetologia, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Sex-Specific Regulation of Glycemic Homeostasis by Theabrownin from Pu-erh Tea.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Advances in clinical research on glucagon.Diabetology international · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Sex Differences in Glucose Homeostasis.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K FaerchSteno Diabetes Center, Niels Steensens Vej 2, DK-2820, Gentofte, Denmark. krif@steno.dk
K Borch-Johnsen
A Vaag
T Jørgensen
D R Witte
Steno Diabetes Center · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Medical Research Council G0501184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisWe aimed to examine whether sex differences in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2 h post-OGTT plasma glucose (2hPG) and HbA(1c) could be explained by differences in body size and/or body composition between men and women in a general non-diabetic Danish population. Moreover, we aimed to study to what degree the newly suggested high-risk HbA(1c) criteria overlapped with the current OGTT-based criteria of glucose intolerance.

methodsWe used cross-sectional data from 6,006 non-diabetic men and women. HbA(1c) and FPG levels were measured and a 75 g OGTT was performed in all individuals. Height, weight and waist and hip circumferences were measured and BMI was calculated. Data were analysed in age-adjusted linear regression models.

resultsMen had higher FPG and HbA(1c) levels than women, and women had higher 2hPG levels than men. Sex differences in 2hPG levels were explained by differences in height and FPG levels, but sex differences in FPG or HbA(1c) levels were not explained by anthropometric measures. Among individuals with HbA(1c) in the high-risk range (6.0-6.5%), 73% had normal glucose tolerance. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationSex differences in 2hPG levels after an OGTT may to some extent be a consequence of giving the same amount of glucose to individuals with different body size. In contrast, sex differences in FPG and HbA(1c) levels are likely to have a true physiological basis. In clinical practice, the HbA(1c) assay may be more convenient than the OGTT, but it is important to note that different populations are identified by the two methods.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAdultAnalysis of VarianceBlood GlucoseBody CompositionBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkFastingFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestGlycated HemoglobinHumansInsulin ResistanceMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID20182862
OpenAlexW2122469044

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.