ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2010
Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography.
Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 675 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comprehensive Treatment of Angina in Women With Microvascular Dysfunction - a Proof of Concept Study of the iPower Cohort
Effect of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Stimulation on Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Women With Angina Pectoris and no Obstructive Stenosis of Major Coronary Vessels
Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Optimize the Diagnostic Yield of Invasive Angiography in Lower Risk Patients
Multisensor Array for the Localisation of Coronary Artery Stenosis
The Multicenter Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Quantitative Perfusion Imaging in the United States (SPINS2) Study
Who cites it
675 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,627 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography versus invasive coronary angiography for detecting coronary artery disease: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of SYNTAX scores between coronary CT angiography and invasive coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review of enrolment criteria and treatment efficacy for microvascular angina.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- Long-term outcomes of ischaemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Open heart · 2024Pooled it
- Shedding Light on Treatment Options for Coronary Vasomotor Disorders: A Systematic Review.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Accelerated stress CMR for the detection of significant coronary artery disease: a prospective randomized diagnostic accuracy study.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2026Trial
- Endotyping-informed therapy for patients with chest pain and no obstructive coronary artery disease: a randomized trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Primary versus iatrogenic (post-PCI) coronary microvascular dysfunction: a wire-based multimodal comparison.Open heart · 2023Trial
- Risk factors based vessel-specific prediction for stages of coronary artery disease using Bayesian quantile regression machine learning method: Results from the PARADIGM registry.Clinical cardiology · 2023Trial
- Construction and validation of a diagnostic model for obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with suspected unstable angina pectoris based on restingQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Pathophysiology and Clinical Relevance of Microvascular Remodeling in Arterial Hypertension.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- The Shifting Boundary Between Invasive and Non-Invasive Angiographic Investigation in Contemporary Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery: An Up-to-Date Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Predictive Modeling of Coronary Artery Disease Using Color Fundus Photography-Based Features of Retinal Vasculature.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Impact of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction on Patient-Reported Symptoms After PCI.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- PET-based assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction and its relation to plaque burden and vascular remodeling: integration with microvascular resistance reserve.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Radial Access Strategies: Focus on Coronary Function Testing for Angina With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Review
- The Contemporary Role of Intracoronary Physiological Assessment: Fractional Flow Reserve, Non-Hyperemic Pressure Ratios, Wireless Technologies, and Microcirculation.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Review
- Great debate: the new risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood model is useful to estimate the initial pre-test probability of obstructive coronary artery disease in individuals with suspected chronic coronary syndromes.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Association of reduced Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase with coronary microvascular dysfunction-An observational study of oxidative stress markers.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
615 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGuidelines for triaging patients for cardiac catheterization recommend a risk assessment and noninvasive testing. We determined patterns of noninvasive testing and the diagnostic yield of catheterization among patients with suspected coronary artery disease in a contemporary national sample.
methodsFrom January 2004 through April 2008, at 663 hospitals in the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry, we identified patients without known coronary artery disease who were undergoing elective catheterization. The patients' demographic characteristics, risk factors, and symptoms and the results of noninvasive testing were correlated with the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease, which was defined as stenosis of 50% or more of the diameter of the left main coronary artery or stenosis of 70% or more of the diameter of a major epicardial vessel.
resultsA total of 398,978 patients were included in the study. The median age was 61 years; 52.7% of the patients were men, 26.0% had diabetes, and 69.6% had hypertension. Noninvasive testing was performed in 83.9% of the patients. At catheterization, 149,739 patients (37.6%) had obstructive coronary artery disease. No coronary artery disease (defined as <20% stenosis in all vessels) was reported in 39.2% of the patients. Independent predictors of obstructive coronary artery disease included male sex (odds ratio, 2.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.64 to 2.76), older age (odds ratio per 5-year increment, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.30), presence of insulin-dependent diabetes (odds ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 2.07 to 2.21), and presence of dyslipidemia (odds ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.57 to 1.67). Patients with a positive result on a noninvasive test were moderately more likely to have obstructive coronary artery disease than those who did not undergo any testing (41.0% vs. 35.0%; P<0.001; adjusted odds ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.37).
conclusionsIn this study, slightly more than one third of patients without known disease who underwent elective cardiac catheterization had obstructive coronary artery disease. Better strategies for risk stratification are needed to inform decisions and to increase the diagnostic yield of cardiac catheterization in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.