Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20220183›Full record

ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2010

Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography.

Manesh R Patel, Eric D Peterson, David Dai, J Matthew Brennan, Rita F Redberg, H Vernon Anderson, Ralph G Brindis, Pamela S Douglas

Erratum issued 5 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 675 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
675citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
60.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02910154 nacompletedstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Comprehensive Treatment of Angina in Women With Microvascular Dysfunction - a Proof of Concept Study of the iPower Cohort

Ran2016Enrolled62Registered outcomes9Posted comparisons0ConditionsAngina Pectoris, Coronary Microvascular DiseaseArmsdiet, Medication (with statin and ACE-inhibition), training
Open the trial in the graph
NCT02602600 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Stimulation on Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Women With Angina Pectoris and no Obstructive Stenosis of Major Coronary Vessels

TypeinterventionalSponsorEva PrescottRan2015 to 2017Enrolled33ConditionsMicrovascular AnginaArmsLiraglutide
NCT03554057 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Optimize the Diagnostic Yield of Invasive Angiography in Lower Risk Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorHamilton Health Sciences CorporationRan2018 to 2022Enrolled186ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsCoronary Computed Tomographic Angiography
NCT04647448 withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Multisensor Array for the Localisation of Coronary Artery Stenosis

TypeobservationalSponsorBarts & The London NHS TrustRan2025 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsCORONARY ARTERY DISEASEArmsApplication of sensor patch
NCT06854458 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Multicenter Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Quantitative Perfusion Imaging in the United States (SPINS2) Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2025 to 2029Enrolled1,000ConditionsIschemic Heart Disease (IHD), Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Myocardial Blood FlowArmsQuantitative Myocardial Blood Flow Evaluation, Qualitative Myocardial Blood Flow Evaluation, Gadavist, Vasodilator, Blood draw for the laboratory assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

675 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,627 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review of enrolment criteria and treatment efficacy for microvascular angina.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Pathophysiology and Clinical Relevance of Microvascular Remodeling in Arterial Hypertension.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Radial Access Strategies: Focus on Coronary Function Testing for Angina With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

615 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Manesh R PatelDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27715, USA. manesh.patel@duke.edu
Eric D Peterson
David Dai
J Matthew Brennan
Rita F Redberg
H Vernon Anderson
Ralph G Brindis
Pamela S Douglas
Duke University · USDuke University Hospital · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Cardiovascular Clinical ResearchT32HL069749 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK, DANIEL B · 2003 to 2023
$6.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines for triaging patients for cardiac catheterization recommend a risk assessment and noninvasive testing. We determined patterns of noninvasive testing and the diagnostic yield of catheterization among patients with suspected coronary artery disease in a contemporary national sample.

methodsFrom January 2004 through April 2008, at 663 hospitals in the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry, we identified patients without known coronary artery disease who were undergoing elective catheterization. The patients' demographic characteristics, risk factors, and symptoms and the results of noninvasive testing were correlated with the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease, which was defined as stenosis of 50% or more of the diameter of the left main coronary artery or stenosis of 70% or more of the diameter of a major epicardial vessel.

resultsA total of 398,978 patients were included in the study. The median age was 61 years; 52.7% of the patients were men, 26.0% had diabetes, and 69.6% had hypertension. Noninvasive testing was performed in 83.9% of the patients. At catheterization, 149,739 patients (37.6%) had obstructive coronary artery disease. No coronary artery disease (defined as <20% stenosis in all vessels) was reported in 39.2% of the patients. Independent predictors of obstructive coronary artery disease included male sex (odds ratio, 2.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.64 to 2.76), older age (odds ratio per 5-year increment, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.30), presence of insulin-dependent diabetes (odds ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 2.07 to 2.21), and presence of dyslipidemia (odds ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.57 to 1.67). Patients with a positive result on a noninvasive test were moderately more likely to have obstructive coronary artery disease than those who did not undergo any testing (41.0% vs. 35.0%; P<0.001; adjusted odds ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.37).

conclusionsIn this study, slightly more than one third of patients without known disease who underwent elective cardiac catheterization had obstructive coronary artery disease. Better strategies for risk stratification are needed to inform decisions and to increase the diagnostic yield of cardiac catheterization in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyAgedCardiac CatheterizationCoronary Artery DiseaseEchocardiographyElectrocardiographyExercise TestFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID20220183
PMCPMC3920593
OpenAlexW2149755434

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.