ArticlePediatric diabetes2011
Use of continuous glucose monitoring in young children with type 1 diabetes: implications for behavioral research.
Article in Pediatric diabetes, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technological Ecological Momentary Assessment Tools to Study Type 1 Diabetes in Youth: Viewpoint of Methodologies.JMIR diabetes · 2021Article
- Reducing Emotional Distress for Childhood Hypoglycemia in Parents (REDCHiP): Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial to Test a Video-Based Telehealth Intervention.JMIR research protocols · 2020Article
- The Association Between Glycemic Variability and Macronutrients in Young Children with T1D.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2020Article
- Benefits and Barriers of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Young Children with Type 1 Diabetes.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2019Article
- Shared Responsibility for Type 1 Diabetes Care Is Associated With Glycemic Variability and Risk of Glycemic Excursions in Youth.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2018Article
- Glycemic variability in patients with Wolfram syndrome is lower than in type 1 diabetes.Acta diabetologica · 2015Article
- Evaluating quality of glycemic control: graphical displays of hypo- and hyperglycemia, time in target range, and mean glucose.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2015Article
- Use of technology when assessing adherence to diabetes self-management behaviors.Current diabetes reports · 2014Review
- Feasibility of prolonged continuous glucose monitoring in toddlers with type 1 diabetes.Pediatric diabetes · 2012Article
- Continuous glucose monitoring: a review for behavioral researchers.Psychosomatic medicine · 2012Review
- A comparison of average daily risk range scores for young children with type 1 diabetes mellitus using continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring data.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2012Article
- International Forum for the Advancement of Diabetes Research and Care, April 29-30, 2011, Athens, Greece.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2011Article
- Pilot study results for a novel behavior plus nutrition intervention for caregivers of young children with type 1 diabetes.Journal of nutrition education and behaviorArticle
- Feasibility and acceptability of ambulatory glucose profile in children with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: A pilot study.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study presents data on the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in young children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). CGM provides moment-to-moment tracking of glucose concentrations and measures of intra- and interday variability, which are particularly salient measures in young children with T1DM.
methodsThirty-one children (mean age = 5.0 yr ) with T1DM wore the Medtronic Minimed CGM for a mean of 66.8 h. The CGM was inserted in diabetes clinics, and parents were provided brief training.
resultsFew difficulties were experienced and families cited the acceptability of CGM. Participants' CGM data are compared with self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) data as well as data from older children with T1DM to illustrate differences in methodology and variability present in this population. CGM data are used to calculate glucose variability, which is found to be related to diabetes variables such as history of hypoglycemic seizures.
conclusionsCGM is an acceptable research tool for obtaining glucose data in young children with T1DM and has been used previously in older children and adults. CGM may be particularly useful in young children who often experience more glucose variability. Data obtained via CGM are richer and more detailed than traditional SMBG data and allow for analyses to link blood glucose with behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.