ArticleExperimental physiology2010
Seeing is believing! Imaging Ca2+-signalling events in living cells.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nuclear envelope mechanobiology: linking the nuclear structure and function.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2021Review
- Fluorescence microscopy.Cold Spring Harbor protocols · 2014Review
- Ca(2+) sparks promote myogenic tone in retinal arterioles.British journal of pharmacology · 2013Article
- Feedback via Ca²⁺-activated ion channels modulates endothelin 1 signaling in retinal arteriolar smooth muscle.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ever since it was shown that maintenance of muscle contraction required the presence of extracellular Ca(2+), evidence has accumulated that Ca(2+) plays a crucial role in excitation-contraction coupling. This culminated in the use of the photoprotein aequorin to demonstrate that [Ca(2+)](i) increased after depolarization but before contraction in barnacle muscle. Green fluorescent protein was extracted from the same jellyfish as aequorin, so this work also has important historical links to the use of fluorescent proteins as markers in living cells. The subsequent development of cell-permeant Ca(2+) indicators resulted in a dramatic increase in related research, revealing Ca(2+) to be a ubiquitous cell signal. High-speed, confocal Ca(2+) imaging has now revealed subcellular detail not previously apparent, with the identification of Ca(2+) sparks. These act as building blocks for larger transients during excitation-contraction coupling in cardiac muscle, but their function in smooth muscle appears more diverse, with evidence suggesting both 'excitatory' and 'inhibitory' roles. Sparks can activate Ca(2+)-sensitive Cl() and K(+) currents, which exert positive and negative feedback, respectively, on global Ca(2+) signalling, through changes in membrane potential and activation of voltage-operated Ca(2+) channels. Calcium imaging has also demonstrated that agonists that appear to evoke relatively tonic increases in average [Ca(2+)](i) at the whole tissue level often stimulate much higher frequency phasic Ca(2+) oscillations at the cellular level. These findings may require re-evaluation of some of our models of Ca(2+) signalling to account for newly revealed cellular and subcellular detail. Future research in the field is likely to make increasing use of genetically coded Ca(2+) indicators expressed in an organelle- or tissue-specific manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.