ArticleHNO2010
[Tongue fixation system for therapy of sleeping disorders. A feasibility study].
Article in HNO, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Tongue fixation in OSA].HNO · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionForward displacement of the tongue is a verified principle in the therapy of sleep disorders which prevents the tongue from sinking backwards thus avoiding obstruction of the upper respiratory tract during sleep. In this feasibility study a novel oral appliance which connects to a pin implanted within the tongue was investigated.
methodsA new tongue positioning system using previously implanted tongue piercings as a pivot was developed. By pulling the tongue forward the oral device prevents airway obstruction. In our study we fitted 10 subjects who already had the tongue pierced with the developed oral device. The subjects underwent two nights of polysomnography with and without using the tongue positioning system. Wearing comfort and side effects were evaluated using a questionnaire. Moderate alcohol consumption was used to provoke snoring or apnea in the subjects. Tongue positioning with and without the device was visualized with oropharyngeal MRI.
resultsSubjects did not report any discomfort or side effects wearing the device. Subjects showed only moderate snoring or apnea after alcohol consumption and snoring after alcohol consumption was reduced with the device. The average apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) was 0.8/h without the device. Using the device led to an increase of apnea in the subjects. MRI visualization showed that the device did not keep the upper airway space opened by fixing the tongue.
conclusionThe effectiveness of the tongue positioning system should be improved by a modification which should be investigated in patients with preexisting sleep disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.