Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20739011›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2010

Oral hypoglycemic agents vs insulin in management of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Jaya Saxena Dhulkotia, Bolarinde Ola, Robert Fraser, Tom Farrell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01998113 (Glyburide and Metformin for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing These Drugs Either vs Insulin or vs Each Other.), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01998113 completedstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Glyburide and Metformin for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing These Drugs Either vs Insulin or vs Each Other.

Ran2013Enrolled2,509Registered outcomes30Posted comparisons0ConditionsGestational Diabetes MellitusArmsGlyburide vs Insulin trials, Metformin vs Glyburide trials, Metformin vs Insulin trials
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Drugs to Control Diabetes During Pregnancy.Clinics in perinatology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Gestational diabetes from A to Z.World journal of diabetes · 2017
    Review
  20. Gestational diabetes mellitus: an updated overview.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jaya Saxena DhulkotiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jessop Wing, Sheffield Teaching Hospital National Health Service Trust, Sheffield, England, United Kingdom. doc15jaya@yahoo.co.uk
Bolarinde Ola
Robert Fraser
Tom Farrell
Jessop Hospital · GBNational Health Service · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this review was to provide pooled estimates of randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of oral hypoglycemic agents with insulin in achieving glycemic control and to study the maternal and perinatal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus. STUDY

designA protocol for the study was developed. All metaanalyses were performed using Stats Direct statistical software (Stats Direct Ltd, Cheshire, UK).

resultsSix studies comprising 1388 subjects were analyzed. No significant differences were found in maternal fasting (weighted mean difference [WMD], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-3.43) or postprandial (WMD, 0.80; 95% CI, -3.26 to 4.87) glycemic control. Use of oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) was not associated with risk of neonatal hypoglycemia (odds ratio [OR], 1.59; 95% CI, 0.70-3.62), increased birthweight (WMD, 56.11; 95% CI, -42.62 to 154.84), incidence of caesarean section (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, -0.68 to 1.22), or incidence of large-for-gestational-age babies (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.61-1.68).

conclusionOur study demonstrates that there are no differences in glycemic control or pregnancy outcomes when OHAs were compared with insulin.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseDiabetes, GestationalFemaleGlyburideHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMetforminPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBlood GlucoseGlyburideHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMetformin

Identifiers

PMID20739011
OpenAlexW2069655518

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.