Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20808951›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2010

Quantitative analysis of the Drosophila segmentation regulatory network using pattern generating potentials.

Majid Kazemian, Charles Blatti, Adam Richards, Michael McCutchan, Noriko Wakabayashi-Ito, Ann S Hammonds, Susan E Celniker, Sudhir Kumar, Scot A Wolfe, Michael H Brodsky and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Behavior-related gene regulatory networks: A new level of organization in the brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Majid KazemianDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, United States of America.
Charles Blatti
Adam Richards
Michael McCutchan
Noriko Wakabayashi-Ito
Ann S Hammonds
Susan E Celniker
Sudhir Kumar
Scot A Wolfe
Michael H Brodsky
Saurabh Sinha

Funding

Patterned Gene Expression in Drosophila DevelopmentR01GM076655 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI CELNIKER, SUSAN E · 2006 to 2020
$6.8M
Systematic Analysis of Drosophila transcription factor binding specificitiesR01HG004744 · NHGRI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BRODSKY, MICHAEL H, WOLFE, SCOT A · 2008 to 2010
$1.9M
High sensitivity discovery of cis-regulatory modulesR01GM085233 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI HALFON, MARC S, SINHA, SAURABH · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004744NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004744-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076655NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085233NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM085233-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cis-regulatory modules that drive precise spatial-temporal patterns of gene expression are central to the process of metazoan development. We describe a new computational strategy to annotate genomic sequences based on their "pattern generating potential" and to produce quantitative descriptions of transcriptional regulatory networks at the level of individual protein-module interactions. We use this approach to convert the qualitative understanding of interactions that regulate Drosophila segmentation into a network model in which a confidence value is associated with each transcription factor-module interaction. Sequence information from multiple Drosophila species is integrated with transcription factor binding specificities to determine conserved binding site frequencies across the genome. These binding site profiles are combined with transcription factor expression information to create a model to predict module activity patterns. This model is used to scan genomic sequences for the potential to generate all or part of the expression pattern of a nearby gene, obtained from available gene expression databases. Interactions between individual transcription factors and modules are inferred by a statistical method to quantify a factor's contribution to the module's pattern generating potential. We use these pattern generating potentials to systematically describe the location and function of known and novel cis-regulatory modules in the segmentation network, identifying many examples of modules predicted to have overlapping expression activities. Surprisingly, conserved transcription factor binding site frequencies were as effective as experimental measurements of occupancy in predicting module expression patterns or factor-module interactions. Thus, unlike previous module prediction methods, this method predicts not only the location of modules but also their spatial activity pattern and the factors that directly determine this pattern. As databases of transcription factor specificities and in vivo gene expression patterns grow, analysis of pattern generating potentials provides a general method to decode transcriptional regulatory sequences and networks.

Indexed as

Body PatterningEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsBinding SitesComputational BiologyDrosophilaInsect ProteinsModels, GeneticProtein BindingSoftwareTranscription FactorsInsect ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID20808951
PMCPMC2923081

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.