ArticlePLoS biology2010
Quantitative analysis of the Drosophila segmentation regulatory network using pattern generating potentials.
Article in PLoS biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 50 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing the regulatory logic of transcriptional control at the DNA sequence level by ensembles of thermodynamic models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- SPREd: a simulation-supervised neural network tool for gene regulatory network reconstruction.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- SPREd: A simulation-supervised neural network tool for gene regulatory network reconstruction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- SEAMoD: A fully interpretable neural network for cis-regulatory analysis of differentially expressed genes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Deciphering enhancer sequence using thermodynamics-based models and convolutional neural networks.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Annotating the Insect Regulatory Genome.Insects · 2021Review
- Behavior-related gene regulatory networks: A new level of organization in the brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Review
- Fully interpretable deep learning model of transcriptional control.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- An in silico analysis of robust but fragile gene regulation links enhancer length to robustness.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Article
- ATAC-seq reveals regional differences in enhancer accessibility during the establishment of spatial coordinates in theGenome research · 2019Article
- REDfly: the transcriptional regulatory element database for Drosophila.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- The regulatory control of Cebpa enhancers and silencers in the myeloid and red-blood cell lineages.PloS one · 2019Article
- An information theoretic treatment of sequence-to-expression modeling.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Synthetic enhancer design by in silico compensatory evolution reveals flexibility and constraint in cis-regulation.BMC systems biology · 2017Article
- Transcriptional precision and accuracy in development: from measurements to models and mechanisms.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2017Review
- Quantitative Measurement and Thermodynamic Modeling of Fused Enhancers Support a Two-Tiered Mechanism for Interpreting Regulatory DNA.Cell reports · 2017Article
- Generation of novel patient-derived CIC- DUX4 sarcoma xenografts and cell lines.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Translating natural genetic variation to gene expression in a computational model of the Drosophila gap gene regulatory network.PloS one · 2017Article
- A sequence level model of an intact locus predicts the location and function of nonadditive enhancers.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cis-regulatory modules that drive precise spatial-temporal patterns of gene expression are central to the process of metazoan development. We describe a new computational strategy to annotate genomic sequences based on their "pattern generating potential" and to produce quantitative descriptions of transcriptional regulatory networks at the level of individual protein-module interactions. We use this approach to convert the qualitative understanding of interactions that regulate Drosophila segmentation into a network model in which a confidence value is associated with each transcription factor-module interaction. Sequence information from multiple Drosophila species is integrated with transcription factor binding specificities to determine conserved binding site frequencies across the genome. These binding site profiles are combined with transcription factor expression information to create a model to predict module activity patterns. This model is used to scan genomic sequences for the potential to generate all or part of the expression pattern of a nearby gene, obtained from available gene expression databases. Interactions between individual transcription factors and modules are inferred by a statistical method to quantify a factor's contribution to the module's pattern generating potential. We use these pattern generating potentials to systematically describe the location and function of known and novel cis-regulatory modules in the segmentation network, identifying many examples of modules predicted to have overlapping expression activities. Surprisingly, conserved transcription factor binding site frequencies were as effective as experimental measurements of occupancy in predicting module expression patterns or factor-module interactions. Thus, unlike previous module prediction methods, this method predicts not only the location of modules but also their spatial activity pattern and the factors that directly determine this pattern. As databases of transcription factor specificities and in vivo gene expression patterns grow, analysis of pattern generating potentials provides a general method to decode transcriptional regulatory sequences and networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.