Trial reportCardiovascular drugs and therapy1990
Verapamil 240 SR versus verapamil 120 SR in arterial hypertension. A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study with 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Trial report in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fifteen patients (6 males, 9 females), age range 36-70 years, were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study according to a Latin-square design, with the aim of comparing 24-hour blood pressure profiles after three 15-day treatment periods with placebo, verapamil SR 120 mg (V120 SR) given twice daily (bid), and verapamil SR 240 mg (V240 SR) given once daily (od). All of the patients were diagnosed as mild or moderate essential hypertensives on the basis of standard casual recordings. Noninvasive 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring was performed with an ICR Spacelab 5200 automatic device. In comparison with placebo, a clinically and statistically significant reduction in both systolic and diastolic BP over 24 hours was obtained with both active treatments. Comparison of the two active treatments shows that V240 SR led to a greater reduction in systolic and diastolic BP than V120 SR. No changes in heart rate were observed. Both treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, both verapamil regimens proved to be effective and safe in treating essential hypertensives, with V240 SR giving better 24-hour BP control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.