Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20828390›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2010

Comparison of multimarker logistic regression models, with application to a genomewide scan of schizophrenia.

James M S Wason, Frank Dudbridge

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Chapter 10: Mining genome-wide genetic markers.PLoS computational biology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James M S WasonMRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK. james.wason@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk.
Frank Dudbridge

Funding

Genome-wide Association Study of SchizophreniaU01MH079470 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LEVINSON, DOUGLAS FREDERICK · 2007 to 2009
$1.1M
Medical Research Council MC_U105292688Medical Research Council U.1052.00.014Medical Research Council WBS U.1052.00.012NIMH NIH HHS 5U01MH079470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) are a widely used study design for detecting genetic causes of complex diseases. Current studies provide good coverage of common causal SNPs, but not rare ones. A popular method to detect rare causal variants is haplotype testing. A disadvantage of this approach is that many parameters are estimated simultaneously, which can mean a loss of power and slower fitting to large datasets.Haplotype testing effectively tests both the allele frequencies and the linkage disequilibrium (LD) structure of the data. LD has previously been shown to be mostly attributable to LD between adjacent SNPs. We propose a generalised linear model (GLM) which models the effects of each SNP in a region as well as the statistical interactions between adjacent pairs. This is compared to two other commonly used multimarker GLMs: one with a main-effect parameter for each SNP; one with a parameter for each haplotype.

resultsWe show the haplotype model has higher power for rare untyped causal SNPs, the main-effects model has higher power for common untyped causal SNPs, and the proposed model generally has power in between the two others. We show that the relative power of the three methods is dependent on the number of marker haplotypes the causal allele is present on, which depends on the age of the mutation. Except in the case of a common causal variant in high LD with markers, all three multimarker models are superior in power to single-SNP tests.Including the adjacent statistical interactions results in lower inflation in test statistics when a realistic level of population stratification is present in a dataset.Using the multimarker models, we analyse data from the Molecular Genetics of Schizophrenia study. The multimarker models find potential associations that are not found by single-SNP tests. However, multimarker models also require stricter control of data quality since biases can have a larger inflationary effect on multimarker test statistics than on single-SNP test statistics.

conclusionsAnalysing a GWAS with multimarker models can yield candidate regions which may contain rare untyped causal variants. This is useful for increasing prior odds of association in future whole-genome sequence analyses.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyLogistic ModelsModels, GeneticComputer SimulationHaplotypesHumansLinkage DisequilibriumPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSchizophreniaSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID20828390
PMCPMC2949738

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.