Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20927202›Full record

ArticleFood & nutrition research2010

Assessment of health claims, content, and safety of herbal supplements containing Ginkgo biloba.

Heidi P Fransen, Sylvia M G J Pelgrom, Barbara Stewart-Knox, Dries de Kaste, Hans Verhagen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food & nutrition research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Systemic exposure to Ginkgo biloba extract in male F344/NCrl rats: Relevance to humans.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. How similar is similar enough? A sufficient similarity case study with Ginkgo biloba extract.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association · 2018
    Article
  8. Review of Ginkgo biloba-induced toxicity, from experimental studies to human case reports.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mechanistic evaluation of Ginkgo biloba leaf extract-induced genotoxicity in L5178Y cells.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Heidi P FransenNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Sylvia M G J Pelgrom
Barbara Stewart-Knox
Dries de Kaste
Hans Verhagen
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEuropean Regulation 1924/2006 states that all health claims made on foods need to be substantiated scientifically.

objectiveTo apply the PASSCLAIM criteria for the scientific substantiation of health claims on foods to herbal supplements containing Ginkgo biloba. Evaluation of three selected claimed health effects for G. biloba (improvement of blood circulation, improvement of symptoms of old age, and improvement of memory) was achieved through review of publicly available scientific data. A total of 35 human intervention studies were evaluated. Commercially available products claimed to contain mainly G. biloba (N=29) were randomly sampled in the Netherlands and analyzed for their content on ginkgo extract. Also, a toxicological risk assessment was performed.

resultsThe three selected health claims investigated could not be substantiated. This was mainly because of a lack of data from studies in healthy volunteers. In most studies results performed with a 24% standardized G. biloba extract were described. However, our chemical analysis showed that 25 of the 29 sampled products did not contain the required minimum 24% standardized extract. Moreover, in most preparations the content of substances typical for G. biloba did not conform to what was declared on the label. Since toxicity data for G. biloba are very limited, a safety limit could not be established.

conclusionsEvidence is lacking for three health claims of herbal products with G. biloba. Neither safety nor efficacy can be guaranteed at the recommended daily dose. The multidisciplinary approach described in this paper provides good insight into issues that are relevant for the evaluation of health claims for herbal food supplements.

Indexed as

botanicalscontentGinkgo bilobahealth claimssafetysubstantiation

Identifiers

PMID20927202
PMCPMC2950792
OpenAlexW1972061426

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.