Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20976274›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Human anti-plague monoclonal antibodies protect mice from Yersinia pestis in a bubonic plague model.

Xiaodong Xiao, Zhongyu Zhu, Jennifer L Dankmeyer, Michael M Wormald, Randy L Fast, Patricia L Worsham, Christopher K Cote, Kei Amemiya, Dimiter S Dimitrov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Vaccines · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Development of Anti-ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaodong XiaoProtein Interactions Group, Center for Cancer Research Nanobiology Program, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Zhongyu Zhu
Jennifer L Dankmeyer
Michael M Wormald
Randy L Fast
Patricia L Worsham
Christopher K Cote
Kei Amemiya
Dimiter S Dimitrov
United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases · USNational Cancer Institute · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · US

Funding

Antibody therapeutics against biodefense-related diseasesZIABC011156 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI DIMITROV, DIMITER S · 2009 to 2017
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS N01 CO012400NCI NIH HHS N01-CO-12400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yersinia pestis is the etiologic agent of plague that has killed more than 200 million people throughout the recorded history of mankind. Antibiotics may provide little immediate relief to patients who have a high bacteremia or to patients infected with an antibiotic resistant strain of plague. Two virulent factors of Y. pestis are the capsid F1 protein and the low-calcium response (Lcr) V-protein or V-antigen that have been proven to be the targets for both active and passive immunization. There are mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the F1- and V-antigens that can passively protect mice in a murine model of plague; however, there are no anti-Yersinia pestis monoclonal antibodies available for prophylactic or therapeutic treatment in humans. We identified one anti-F1-specific human mAb (m252) and two anti-V-specific human mAb (m253, m254) by panning a naïve phage-displayed Fab library against the F1- and V-antigens. The Fabs were converted to IgG1s and their binding and protective activities were evaluated. M252 bound weakly to peptides located at the F1 N-terminus where a protective mouse anti-F1 mAb also binds. M253 bound strongly to a V-antigen peptide indicating a linear epitope; m254 did not bind to any peptide from a panel of 53 peptides suggesting that its epitope may be conformational. M252 showed better protection than m253 and m254 against a Y, pestis challenge in a plague mouse model. A synergistic effect was observed when the three antibodies were combined. Incomplete to complete protection was achieved when m252 was given at different times post-challenge. These antibodies can be further studied to determine their potential as therapeutics or prophylactics in Y. pestis infection in humans.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEpitope MappingMicePlagueYersinia pestisAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

PMID20976274
PMCPMC2954148
OpenAlexW2124082519

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.