Evidence mapPaperPMID 21053992Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2010

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single rising intravenous doses (0.5 mg-10 mg) and determination of absolute bioavailability of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin (BI 1356) in healthy male subjects.

Silke Retlich, Vincent Duval, Arne Ring, Alexander Staab, Silke Hüttner, Arvid Jungnik, Ulrich Jaehde, Klaus A Dugi, Ulrike Graefe-Mody

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Target-mediated exposure enhancement: a previously unexplored limit of TMDD.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Linagliptin: from bench to bedside.Drug design, development and therapy · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Pharmacokinetics of linagliptin in subjects with hepatic impairment.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2012
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Potential role of linagliptin as an oral once-daily treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2012
    Article
  15. Efficacy and safety of linagliptin (tradjenta) in adults with type-2 diabetes mellitus.P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management · 2011
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Silke RetlichDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Vincent Duval
Arne Ring
Alexander Staab
Silke Hüttner
Arvid Jungnik
Ulrich Jaehde
Klaus A Dugi
Ulrike Graefe-Mody
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesLinagliptin (BI 1356) is a highly specific inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4, which is currently in phase III clinical development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Linagliptin exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics after oral administration, which are mainly related to concentration-dependent binding of linagliptin to its target, DPP-4. The objectives of the study were to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics after intravenous administration of linagliptin and to determine its absolute bioavailability (F). SUBJECTS AND

methodsThis was a single rising-dose, randomized, four-group, placebo-controlled, single-blind (within dose groups) study. Thirty-six healthy men aged 18-50 years were enrolled and randomized into four sequential treatment groups. Group 1 received linagliptin 0.5 mg intravenously, group 2 received 2.5 mg intravenously and group 4 received 10 mg intravenously. In group 3, subjects underwent a two-way randomized crossover, receiving 5 mg intravenously and a 10 mg oral tablet. Linagliptin concentrations in plasma and urine, as well as plasma DPP-4 activity, were determined by validated assays. Noncompartmental analysis and population pharmacokinetic modelling were performed.

resultsLinagliptin showed nonlinear pharmacokinetics after intravenous infusion of 0.5-10 mg, with a less than dose-proportional increase in exposure. Noncompartmental parameters were calculated on the basis of total (i.e. bound and unbound) plasma concentrations. The total clearance value was low and increased with dose from 2.51 to 14.3 L/h. The apparent steady-state volume of distribution (V(ss)) increased with dose from 380 to 1540 L. Renal excretion of the unchanged parent compound increased with increasing plasma concentrations from 2.72% in the 0.5 mg dose group to 23.0% in the 10 mg dose group. The terminal elimination half-life was comparable across dose groups (126-139 hours). Because of the nonlinear pharmacokinetics, the standard approach of comparing the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) after oral administration with the AUC after intravenous administration led to dose-dependent estimates of the absolute bioavailability. Therefore, a population pharmacokinetic model was developed, accounting for the concentration-dependent protein binding of linagliptin to its target enzyme, DPP-4. The model-derived estimates of the V(ss) and clearance of linagliptin not bound to DPP-4 were 402.2 L and 26.9 L/h, respectively. The absolute bioavailability was estimated to be about 30% for the linagliptin 10 mg tablet.

conclusionThe nonlinear pharmacokinetic characteristics and the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship of linagliptin were independent of the mode of administration (intravenous or oral). Because of the nonlinear pharmacokinetics, the standard approach of comparing the AUC after oral administration with the AUC after intravenous administration was inappropriate to determine the absolute bioavailability of linagliptin. By a modelling approach, the absolute bioavailability of the 10 mg linagliptin tablet was estimated to be about 30%.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdolescentAdultArea Under CurveBiological AvailabilityCross-Over StudiesDipeptidyl Peptidase 4Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsDose-Response Relationship, DrugHalf-LifeHumansInfusions, IntravenousLinagliptinMaleMiddle AgedProtein BindingDipeptidyl Peptidase 4Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsLinagliptinPurinesQuinazolinesTablets

Identifiers

PMID21053992
OpenAlexW2068745223

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.