Evidence mapPaperPMID 21122063Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2010

Effects of pioglitazone and metformin fixed-dose combination therapy on cardiovascular risk markers of inflammation and lipid profile compared with pioglitazone and metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Alfonso Perez, Randal Jacks, Vipin Arora, Robert Spanheimer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT00727857. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00727857 phase3completed

A Phase 3b, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone HCl and Metformin HCl Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy Compared to Pioglitazone HCl Monotherapy and to Metformin HCl Monotherapy in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

Ran2007Enrolled600Registered outcomes27Posted comparisons81ConditionsDiabetes MellitusArmsMetformin, Pioglitazone, Pioglitazone and metformin
PMID 19827910other papers from this trial
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alfonso PerezTakeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc, Deerfield, IL, USA. aperez@tgrd.com
Randal Jacks
Vipin Arora
Robert Spanheimer
Takeda (United States) · USDeerfield (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment should not increase cardiovascular (CV) risk and at best could provide benefit beyond lowering glucose. Pioglitazone has demonstrated a favorable CV profile relative to other oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in outcome and observational studies. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group controlled study examined circulating biomarkers of CV risk in T2DM patients receiving a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of pioglitazone/metformin compared with the respective monotherapies. Patients with stable glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c) ) for 3 months taking no OADs were treated with pioglitazone 15mg/metformin 850mg FDC twice daily (bid), pioglitazone 15mg bid, or metformin 850mg bid for 24 weeks. FDC and pioglitazone increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 14.20% and 9.88%, respectively, vs an increase of 6.09% with metformin (P<.05, metformin vs FDC). Triglycerides decreased with all three treatments -5.95%, -5.54% and -1.78%, respectively; P=not significant). FDC and pioglitazone significantly decreased small low-density lipoprotein and increased large low-density lipoprotein particle concentrations. Reductions in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were greater in the FDC and pioglitazone groups. Increases in adiponectin were significant in the FDC and pioglitazone groups (P<.0001 vs metformin). Overall, adverse events were not higher with the FDC. Thus, treatment with the FDC resulted in improved levels of CV biomarkers, which were better than or equal to monotherapy.

Indexed as

AdiponectinAdultAgedBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesC-Reactive ProteinDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInflammationLipidsAdiponectinBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsLipidsMetforminPioglitazoneThiazolidinediones

Identifiers

PMID21122063
PMCPMC8672983
OpenAlexW1969743766

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.