Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21212391›Full record

ReviewCirculation research2011

Computational models reduce complexity and accelerate insight into cardiac signaling networks.

Jason H Yang, Jeffrey J Saucerman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Cardiac macrophage biology in the steady-state heart, the aging heart, and following myocardial infarction.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jason H YangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 22908, USA.
Jeffrey J Saucerman

Funding

BIOTECHNOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008715 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI LAURIE, GORDON WILLIAM · 2000 to 2019
$6.6M
Quantitative analysis of cAMP compartmentation in heartR01HL094476 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SAUCERMAN, JEFFREY J. · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL094476NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL094476NIGMS NIH HHS GM08715NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac signaling networks exhibit considerable complexity in size and connectivity. The intrinsic complexity of these networks complicates the interpretation of experimental findings. This motivates new methods for investigating the mechanisms regulating cardiac signaling networks and the consequences these networks have on cardiac physiology and disease. Next-generation experimental techniques are also generating a wealth of genomic and proteomic data that can be difficult to analyze or interpret. Computational models are poised to play a key role in addressing these challenges. Computational models have a long history in contributing to the understanding of cardiac physiology and are useful for identifying biological mechanisms, inferring multiscale consequences to cell signaling activities and reducing the complexity of large data sets. Models also integrate well with experimental studies to explain experimental observations and generate new hypotheses. Here, we review the contributions computational modeling approaches have made to the analysis of cardiac signaling networks and forecast opportunities for computational models to accelerate cardiac signaling research.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularAnimalsHeartHumansSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID21212391
PMCPMC3076046

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.