Evidence mapPaperPMID 21246352Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2011

Modelling and simulation as research tools in paediatric drug development.

Francesco Bellanti, Oscar Della Pasqua

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06012266 phase2unknown statusstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Dose Rationale for Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin in Paediatric Heart Failure: a Phase II.a Pharmacokinetics, Ease-of-swallow, Safety and Proof-of-concept Study Among Children 6-18 Years of Age

Ran2024Enrolled12Registered outcomes19Posted comparisons0ConditionsHeart FailureArmsDapagliflozin Tablet, Empagliflozin Tablets
Open the trial in the graph
NCT06643442 phase2not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Repurposing Empagliflozin for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy - Associated Cardiomyopathy: a Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Proof-of-concept Study Among Children 6-18 Years of Age

TypeinterventionalSponsorSebastiano LavaRan2025 to 2027Enrolled12ConditionsDMD-associated Dilated CardiomyopathyArmsEmpagliflozin Tablets
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Population pharmacokinetics and dosing optimisation of imipenem in critically ill patients.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francesco BellantiDivision of Pharmacology, Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Oscar Della Pasqua

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough practical and ethical constraints impose special requirements for the evaluation of treatment safety and efficacy in children, the main issue remains the empirical basis for patient stratification and dose selection at the early stage of the development of new chemical and biological entities. The aim of this review is to highlight the advantages and limitations of modelling and simulation (M&S) in supporting decision making during paediatric drug development.

methodsA literature search on Pubmed's database Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) has been performed to retrieve relevant publications on the use of model-based approaches in paediatric drug development and therapeutics.

resultsM&S enable the assessment of the impact of different regimens as well as of different populations on a drug's safety and efficacy profile. It has been widely used in the last two decades to support pre-clinical and early clinical drug development. In fact, M&S have been applied to drug development as decision tools, as study optimization tools and as data analysis tools. In particular, this approach can be used to support dose adjustment in specific subgroups of a population. M&S may therefore allow the individualisation of drug therapy in children, improving the risk-benefit ratio in this population.

conclusionsThe lack of consensus on how to assess the impact of developmental factors on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety has so far prevented a broader use of M&S. This problem is compounded by the limited collaboration between stakeholders, which prevents data sharing in this field. In this article, we emphasise the need for a concerted effort to promote the effective use of this technology in paediatric drug development and avoid unnecessary exposure of children to clinical trials.

Indexed as

Drug DesignModels, BiologicalChildClinical Trials as TopicComputer SimulationHumansPediatricsRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID21246352
PMCPMC3082698

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.