Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21304941›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2011

Quantitative models of the mechanisms that control genome-wide patterns of transcription factor binding during early Drosophila development.

Tommy Kaplan, Xiao-Yong Li, Peter J Sabo, Sean Thomas, John A Stamatoyannopoulos, Mark D Biggin, Michael B Eisen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Role of the pioneer transcription factor GATA2 in health and disease.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Exploiting regulatory heterogeneity to systematically identify enhancers with high accuracy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tommy KaplanDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, California Institute of Quantitative Biosciences, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Xiao-Yong Li
Peter J Sabo
Sean Thomas
John A Stamatoyannopoulos
Mark D Biggin
Michael B Eisen
University of Washington · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Transcription Network Controlling Drosophila DevelopmentR01GM070444 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI BIGGIN, MARK D · 2003 to 2007
$14.9M
Modeling the Evolution and Function of Drosophila cis-Regulatory ModulesR01HG002779 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI EISEN, MICHAEL BRUCE · 2003 to 2012
$5.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG002779NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002779NIGMS NIH HHS GM704403NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription factors that drive complex patterns of gene expression during animal development bind to thousands of genomic regions, with quantitative differences in binding across bound regions mediating their activity. While we now have tools to characterize the DNA affinities of these proteins and to precisely measure their genome-wide distribution in vivo, our understanding of the forces that determine where, when, and to what extent they bind remains primitive. Here we use a thermodynamic model of transcription factor binding to evaluate the contribution of different biophysical forces to the binding of five regulators of early embryonic anterior-posterior patterning in Drosophila melanogaster. Predictions based on DNA sequence and in vitro protein-DNA affinities alone achieve a correlation of ∼0.4 with experimental measurements of in vivo binding. Incorporating cooperativity and competition among the five factors, and accounting for spatial patterning by modeling binding in every nucleus independently, had little effect on prediction accuracy. A major source of error was the prediction of binding events that do not occur in vivo, which we hypothesized reflected reduced accessibility of chromatin. To test this, we incorporated experimental measurements of genome-wide DNA accessibility into our model, effectively restricting predicted binding to regions of open chromatin. This dramatically improved our predictions to a correlation of 0.6-0.9 for various factors across known target genes. Finally, we used our model to quantify the roles of DNA sequence, accessibility, and binding competition and cooperativity. Our results show that, in regions of open chromatin, binding can be predicted almost exclusively by the sequence specificity of individual factors, with a minimal role for protein interactions. We suggest that a combination of experimentally determined chromatin accessibility data and simple computational models of transcription factor binding may be used to predict the binding landscape of any animal transcription factor with significant precision.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsBase SequenceBinding SitesChromatinComputational BiologyDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterGenome, InsectModels, GeneticTranscription FactorsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21304941
PMCPMC3033374
OpenAlexW2027458139

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.