Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21318299›Full record

GuidelineInternational journal of colorectal disease2011

Evidence-based German guidelines for surgery for obesity.

Norbert Runkel, Mario Colombo-Benkmann, Thomas P Hüttl, Harald Tigges, Oliver Mann, Ricarda Flade-Kuthe, Edvard Shang, Martin Susewind, Stefani Wolff, Ricarda Wunder and 5 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in International journal of colorectal disease, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Polish Expert Consensus on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: 2025 update.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Norbert RunkelDeutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viseralchirurgie, Klinik für Allgemein-, Visceral- und Kinderchirurgie, Vöhrenbacherstr. 15, 78050 Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany. avc@sbk-vs.de
Mario Colombo-Benkmann
Thomas P Hüttl
Harald Tigges
Oliver Mann
Ricarda Flade-Kuthe
Edvard Shang
Martin Susewind
Stefani Wolff
Ricarda Wunder
Alfred Wirth
Klaus Winckler
Arved Weimann
Martina de Zwaan
Stefan Sauerland

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe young field of obesity surgery (bariatric surgery) in Germany expands as a consequence of the rapid increase of overweight and obesity. New surgical methods, minimal access techniques, and the enormous increase of scientific studies and evidence, all contribute to the success of bariatric surgery, which is the only realistic chance of permanent weight loss and regression of secondary diseases in many cases.

methodsA systematic literature review, classification of evidence, graded recommendations, and interdisciplinary consensus.

resultsObesity surgery is an integral component of the multimodal treatment of obesity, which consists of multidisciplinary evaluation and preparation, conservative and surgical treatment elements, and a life-long follow-up. The guideline confirms the body mass index (BMI)-based spectrum of indications (BMI > 40 kg/m(2) or >35 kg/m(2) with secondary diseases) and extends it through elimination of all age restrictions (>18 years and <60 years) and most of the contraindications. Precondition for surgery is the failure of a structured conservative program of 6-12 months or the expected futility of it. Type II diabetes mellitus becomes an independent indication criterion for BMI < 35 kg/m(2) (metabolic surgery). The standard techniques are gastric balloon, gastric banding, gastric bypass, gastric sleeve, and biliopancreatic diversion. The choice of procedure is based on profound knowledge of results, long-term effects, complications, and patient-specific circumstances. The after-care should be structured and organized long term.

conclusionThe S3-guidelines contain evidence-based recommendations for the indication, selection of procedure, technique, and follow-up. Patient care should improve after implementation of these guidelines in clinical practice. Compliance by decision makers and health insurers is warranted.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryEvidence-Based MedicineGermanyHumansObesityPostoperative CareTime Factors

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.