ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2011
Flow distribution during infusion of UW and HTK solution in anaesthetised rats.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of in situ versus ex situ perfusion on flow and microcirculation in kidney procurement: research on a porcine model.Transplantation research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOrgan transplantation necessitates the use of preservation solutions to maintain the integrity of the organs during retrieval. The aim of this study was to investigate the flow distribution in abdominal organs in rats during acute infusion of preservation solution.
methodsMicrospheres were used to estimate the distribution of flow in the pancreas, duodenum, ileum, colon, liver, kidneys and lungs in untreated Wistar-Furth rats and in animals with an opened abdominal cavity and catheterised aorta. Some animals were infused by free flow of 5 ml of UW, HTK or Ringer solution containing microspheres at a pressure of 100 cm H(2)O through an intra-aortic catheter.
resultsOpening of the abdominal cavity did not affect any of the organ blood flow values. However, the fraction of total pancreatic blood flow diverted through the islets increased. During infusion of microsphere-containing UW, HTK or Ringer solution, splanchnic and renal organ flow values, represented by microsphere contents, were similar. The fraction of microspheres found in the islets was lower in UW-infused rats. The number of microspheres present in the lungs or liver was very low, suggesting that shunting was negligible.
conclusionsInfusion of HTK and UW solution into anaesthetised rats results in a flow distribution which is similar to that in normal animals in most abdominal organs, but there is a reduction in islet blood perfusion by UW but not HTK solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.