Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21333602›Full record

ArticleComputational biology and chemistry2011

Effective sample size: Quick estimation of the effect of related samples in genetic case-control association analyses.

Yaning Yang, Elaine F Remmers, Chukwuma B Ogunwole, Daniel L Kastner, Peter K Gregersen, Wentian Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational biology and chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Detection ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. On the Question of Effective Sample Size in Network Modeling: An Asymptotic Inquiry.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yaning YangDepartment of Statistics and Finance, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui, Hefei, China.
Elaine F Remmers
Chukwuma B Ogunwole
Daniel L Kastner
Peter K Gregersen
Wentian Li
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases · USFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · USUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

Genetic Analysis of Complex Inflammatory DisordersZIAHG200371 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KASTNER, DANIEL · 2011 to 2024
$18.8M
NARAC The Genetics of Rheumatoid ArthritisR01AR044422 · NIAMS · NORTH SHORE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL · PI GREGERSEN, PETER K. · 1997 to 2011
$6.0M
CONTINUATION OF THE GENETICS OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS-264022263N01AR022263 · NIAMS · NORTH SHORE-LONG ISLAND JEWISH · 2002 to 2005
–
Intramural NIH HHSNIAMS NIH HHS N01 AR022263NIAMS NIH HHS N01-AR22263NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR044422NIAMS NIH HHS R01-AR44422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affected relatives are essential for pedigree linkage analysis, however, they cause a violation of the independent sample assumption in case-control association studies. To avoid the correlation between samples, a common practice is to take only one affected sample per pedigree in association analysis. Although several methods exist in handling correlated samples, they are still not widely used in part because these are not easily implemented, or because they are not widely known. We advocate the effective sample size method as a simple and accessible approach for case-control association analysis with correlated samples. This method modifies the chi-square test statistic, p-value, and 95% confidence interval of the odds-ratio by replacing the apparent number of allele or genotype counts with the effective ones in the standard formula, without the need for specialized computer programs. We present a simple formula for calculating effective sample size for many types of relative pairs and relative sets. For allele frequency estimation, the effective sample size method captures the variance inflation exactly. For genotype frequency, simulations showed that effective sample size provides a satisfactory approximation. A gene which is previously identified as a type 1 diabetes susceptibility locus, the interferon-induced helicase gene (IFIH1), is shown to be significantly associated with rheumatoid arthritis when the effective sample size method is applied. This significant association is not established if only one affected sib per pedigree were used in the association analysis. Relationship between the effective sample size method and other methods - the generalized estimation equation, variance of eigenvalues for correlation matrices, and genomic controls - are discussed.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationGenome-Wide Association StudyCase-Control StudiesHumansSample Size

Identifiers

PMID21333602
PMCPMC3119257
OpenAlexW2124283048

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.