Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21528365›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2011

[Urinary diversion in childhood: special attention to the long-term consequences and complications].

R Stein, A Schröder, J W Thüroff

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R SteinAbteilung Kinderurologie der Urologischen Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Deutschland. raimund.stein@unimedizin-mainz.de
A Schröder
J W Thüroff
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For reconstruction of the urinary tract almost all bowel segments have been used. Today ileal and colonic segments are used for bladder augmentation, substitution, continent or incontinent urinary diversion. In patients with a competent anal sphincter and normal renal function, the rectosigmoid pouch is an option. Urinary diversion in the paediatric age group is mostly performed in patients with dilated upper urinary tracts. Consequently the complication rate is increased with reoperation rates of up to 42%.Incorporation of bowel segments into the urinary tract can have metabolic consequences. Each bowel segment has its own characteristic and specific complications. These relate to the acid-base balance, absorption of vitamins and reabsorption of bile acids (causing diarrhoea) from the small bowel. Due to the risk of secondary malignancies, lifelong surveillance of the patients is mandatory, especially in those with continent anal diversion and after bladder augmentation.

Indexed as

ChildFemaleHumansMaleMetabolic DiseasesUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrinary Diversion

Identifiers

PMID21528365
OpenAlexW1565426399

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.