ReviewJournal of diabetes2012
Incretin-based therapies.
Review in Journal of diabetes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06894784 (Semaglutide And Empagliflozin Combination Therapy Added To Automated Insulin Delivery In Adults With Type 1 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Semaglutide And Empagliflozin Combination Therapy Added To Automated Insulin Delivery In Adults With Type 1 Diabetes (SEMPA)
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac implications of hypoglycaemia in patients with diabetes - a systematic review.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2013Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of oral insulin versus placebo for patients with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Indian journal of pharmacologyPooled it
- Evolution of incretin-based therapies: From GLP-1 monotherapy to dual and triple agonists: A new era in metabolic therapy.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Novel Therapeutic Agents for Management of Diabetes Mellitus: A Hope for Drug Designing against Diabetes Mellitus.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- One-year trends from the LANDMARC trial: A 3-year, pan-India, prospective, longitudinal study on the management and real-world outcomes of type 2 diabetes mellitus.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2022Observational
- Emerging Treatment Strategies for Diabetes Mellitus and Associated Complications: An Update.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Beneficial effects of posttransplant dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor administration after pancreas transplantation to improve β cell function.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2021Article
- Article
- Lixisenatide: A New Member of the Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Class of Incretin Therapies.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2016Article
- Brain signaling systems in the Type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome: promising target to treat and prevent these diseases.Future science OA · 2015Review
- Therapeutic Options for the Management of Postprandial Glucose in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Basal Insulin.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2015Article
- GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide reverses long-term atypical antipsychotic treatment associated behavioral depression and metabolic abnormalities in rats.Metabolic brain disease · 2015Article
- The association of the treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide or insulin with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective observational study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2015Observational
- DPP4 in Diabetes.Frontiers in immunology · 2015Review
- A review of newer treatment approaches for type-2 diabetes: Focusing safety and efficacy of incretin based therapy.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2014Review
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review of current trends.Oman medical journal · 2012Article
- Effects of DPP4 Inhibitors on Renal Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismReview
- Evaluation of treatment satisfaction, efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in geriatric patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectionalcomparative study.Journal of family medicine and primary careArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incretin-based therapies have established a foothold in the diabetes armamentarium through the introduction of oral dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and the injectable class, the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. In 2009, the American Diabetes Association and European Association for the Study of Diabetes authored a revised consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy in Type 2 diabetes (T2D). The revised algorithm accounts for the entry of incretin-based therapies into common clinical practice, especially where control of body weight and hypoglycemia are concerns. The gut-borne incretin hormones have powerful effects on glucose homeostasis, particularly in the postprandial period, when approximately two-thirds of the β-cell response to a given meal is due to the incretin effect. There is also evidence that the incretin effect is attenuated in patients with T2D, whereby the β-cell becomes less responsive to incretin signals. The foundation of incretin-based therapies is to target this previously unrecognized feature of diabetes pathophysiology, resulting in sustained improvements in glycemic control and improved body weight control. In addition, emerging evidence suggests that incretin-based therapies may have a positive impact on inflammation, cardiovascular and hepatic health, sleep, and the central nervous system. In the present article, we discuss the attributes of current and near-future incretin-based therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.