Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21720672›Full record

ArticleThe review of diabetic studies : RDS2011

Risks and benefits of transplantation in the cure of type 1 diabetes: whole pancreas versus islet transplantation. A single center study.

Paola Maffi, Marina Scavini, Carlo Socci, Lorenzo Piemonti, Rossana Caldara, Chiara Gremizzi, Raffaella Melzi, Rita Nano, Elena Orsenigo, Massimo Venturini and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The review of diabetic studies : RDS, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Considerations for an Alternative Site of Islet Cell Transplantation.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Effects of Periodic Intensive Insulin Therapy: An Updated Review.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2019
    Review
  11. Review
  12. A Comparative Analysis of the Safety, Efficacy, and Cost of Islet Versus Pancreas Transplantation in Nonuremic Patients With Type 1 Diabetes.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The current state of pancreas transplantation.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2013
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Why is organ transplantation clinically important?Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2013
    Review
  19. 25 YEARS OF THE RICORDI AUTOMATED METHOD FOR ISLET ISOLATION.CellR4-- repair, replacement, regeneration, & reprogramming · 2013
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Paola MaffiDiabetes Research Institute, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milano, Italy. maffi.paola@hsr.it
Marina Scavini
Carlo Socci
Lorenzo Piemonti
Rossana Caldara
Chiara Gremizzi
Raffaella Melzi
Rita Nano
Elena Orsenigo
Massimo Venturini
Carlo Staudacher
Alessandro Del Maschio
Antonio Secchi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreas and islet transplantation are the only available options to replace beta-cell function in patients with type 1 diabetes. Great variability in terms of rate of success for both approaches is reported in the literature and it is difficult to compare the respective risks and benefits.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to analyze risks and benefits of pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) and islet transplantation alone (ITA) by making use of the long-term experience of a single center where both transplantations are performed. We focused on the risks and benefits of both procedures, with the objective of better defining indications and providing evidence to support the decision-making process. The outcomes of 33 PTA and 33 ITA were analyzed, and pancreas and islet function (i.e., insulin independence), perioperative events, and long-term adverse events were recorded.

resultsWe observed a higher rate of insulin independence in PTA (75%) versus ITA (59%), with the longer insulin independence among PTA patients receiving tacrolimus. The occurrence of adverse events was higher for PTA patients in terms of hospitalization length and frequency, re-intervention for surgical and immunological acute complications, CMV reactivation, and other infections.

conclusionsIn conclusion, these results support the practice of listing patients for PTA when the metabolic control and the progression of chronic complications require a rapid normalization of glucose levels, with the exception of patients with cardiovascular disease, because of the high surgical risks. ITA is indicated when replacement of beta-cell mass is needed in patients with a high surgical risk.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansInsulinIslets of Langerhans TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPancreas TransplantationRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeInsulin

Identifiers

PMID21720672
PMCPMC3143676
OpenAlexW2254143094

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.