Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21750678›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2011

A systematic screen for tube morphogenesis and branching genes in the Drosophila tracheal system.

Amin S Ghabrial, Boaz P Levi, Mark A Krasnow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. TheProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Hippo effector, Yorkie, is a tumor suppressor in selectProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Regulation of Archease by the mTOR-vATPase axis.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Differential Expression ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Hippo signalling during development.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Time to make the doughnuts: Building and shaping seamless tubes.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amin S GhabrialDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. ghabrial@mail.med.upenn.edu
Boaz P Levi
Mark A Krasnow

Funding

Competition and morphogenesis in tip cell-mediated branching of tubular networksR01GM089782 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GHABRIAL, AMIN S · 2010 to 2022
$4.2M
CELLULAR COMMUNICATION IN MORPHOGENESISR01GM047735 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KRASNOW, MARK A · 1991 to 2003
$678k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM089782-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM047735NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089782NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM47735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many signaling proteins and transcription factors that induce and pattern organs have been identified, but relatively few of the downstream effectors that execute morphogenesis programs. Because such morphogenesis genes may function in many organs and developmental processes, mutations in them are expected to be pleiotropic and hence ignored or discarded in most standard genetic screens. Here we describe a systematic screen designed to identify all Drosophila third chromosome genes (∼40% of the genome) that function in development of the tracheal system, a tubular respiratory organ that provides a paradigm for branching morphogenesis. To identify potentially pleiotropic morphogenesis genes, the screen included analysis of marked clones of homozygous mutant tracheal cells in heterozygous animals, plus a secondary screen to exclude mutations in general "house-keeping" genes. From a collection including more than 5,000 lethal mutations, we identified 133 mutations representing ∼70 or more genes that subdivide the tracheal terminal branching program into six genetically separable steps, a previously established cell specification step plus five major morphogenesis and maturation steps: branching, growth, tubulogenesis, gas-filling, and maintenance. Molecular identification of 14 of the 70 genes demonstrates that they include six previously known tracheal genes, each with a novel function revealed by clonal analysis, and two well-known growth suppressors that establish an integral role for cell growth control in branching morphogenesis. The rest are new tracheal genes that function in morphogenesis and maturation, many through cytoskeletal and secretory pathways. The results suggest systematic genetic screens that include clonal analysis can elucidate the full organogenesis program and that over 200 patterning and morphogenesis genes are required to build even a relatively simple organ such as the Drosophila tracheal system.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterGenes, InsectAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenes, LethalHeterozygoteHomozygoteMorphogenesisMutationTracheaTranscription FactorsDrosophila ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21750678
PMCPMC3131284

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.