Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2180027›Full record

ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)1990

The biology and medicine of sailing.

R J Shephard

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Indicators of maximal hiking performance in Laser sailors.European journal of applied physiology · 2006
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Sailing and sports medicine: a literature review.British journal of sports medicine · 2006
    Review
  4. Biology and medicine of sailing. An update.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 1997
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

R J ShephardSchool of Physical and Health Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physiological demands of sailing are highly specific, varying with wind conditions, type of craft, and crew position. In a light wind, the only physiological variable yet shown to influence performance is the resting blood sugar. Under high wind conditions, the skipper should be light (less than 60 kg), but crew members should be heavy (greater than 80 kg). Height does not seem a great advantage to crew, possibly because they then lack the muscular strength to exploit the added leverage. Muscle strength, endurance and a tolerance of anaerobic metabolism are all desirable attributes of crew, and competitive performance can be improved by a winter training programme that develops these aspects of muscle performance in the abdominal and thigh regions. The skipper must meet intense and prolonged cerebral demands in the face of periodic isometric work; performance may thus be helped by ingestion of carbohydrate over the course of a race. The ability to sustain isometric contractions in the 'hiking' position may also be improved if the muscles are preloaded with glycogen. The combination of a heavy body build, above average age for an athlete and sustained isometric contraction probably makes the yachting enthusiast vulnerable to ischaemic heart disease. Advisors to a sailing team must further take account of the risks presented by immersion in cold water, loss of sleep, circadian variations of performance over an event, and problems of motion sickness in rough weather.

Indexed as

SportsCircadian RhythmHumansIsometric ContractionMuscle ContractionPhysical Education and TrainingPhysical EndurancePsychomotor PerformanceWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID2180027
OpenAlexW2037209533

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.