SynthesisThe American journal of gastroenterology2011
Is diabetes mellitus an independent risk factor for colon cancer and rectal cancer?
Synthesis in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 191 papers, 30 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
191 citing papers in PubMed, 30 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 370 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intravenous Thrombolysis Combined With Endovascular Treatment Versus Endovascular Treatment Alone in Acute Ischemic Stroke due to Tandem Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Risk of colorectal cancer in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 million participants.BMC neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Acute carotid stenting versus non-stenting treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to tandem lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Total thyroidectomy versus unilateral lobectomy for unilateral multifocal papillary thyroid carcinoma: systematic review and meta‑analysis.Updates in surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Transoral robotic surgery vs. non-robotic surgeries for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Postoperative short-term mortality between insulin-treated and non-insulin-treated patients with diabetes after non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Household polluting cooking fuels and adverse birth outcomes: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- Meta-Analysis of Altered Gut Microbiota Reveals Microbial and Metabolic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Pooled it
- Functional Neural Alterations in Pathological Internet Use: A Meta-Analysis of Neuroimaging Studies.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Diabetes and Risks of Right-Sided and Left-Sided Colon Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohorts.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Relationship between Egg Consumption and Metabolic Syndrome. A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2022Pooled it
- Posterior decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2021Pooled it
- Is anterior decompression and fusion superior to laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament? A systematic review and meta-analysis.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Associations of Dietary and Circulating Vitamin E Level With Metabolic Syndrome. A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Vitamin C and Metabolic Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Associations of Whole Grain and Refined Grain Consumption With Metabolic Syndrome. A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Association Between Childhood Maltreatment and Symptoms of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Pooled it
- Photoselective vaporization has comparative efficacy and safety among high-risk benign prostate hyperplasia patients on or off systematic anticoagulation: a meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2019Pooled it
- Metabolic syndrome and liver-related events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2019Pooled it
131 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDiabetes mellitus (DM) has been associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). The American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening 2008 recommend that clinicians be aware of an increased CRC risk in patients with smoking and obesity, but do not highlight the increase in CRC risk in patients with DM. To provide an updated quantitative assessment of the association of DM with colon cancer (CC) and rectal cancer (RC), we conducted a meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. We also evaluated whether the association varied by sex, and assessed potential confounders including obesity, smoking, and exercise.
methodsWe identified studies by searching the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases (from inception through 31 December 2009) and by searching bibliographies of relevant articles. Summary relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with fixed- and random-effects models. Several subgroup analyses were performed to explore potential study heterogeneity and bias.
resultsDM was associated with an increased risk of CC (summary RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.26-1.51; n=14 studies) and RC (summary RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.31; n=12 studies). The association remained when we limited the meta-analysis to studies that either controlled for smoking and obesity, or for smoking, obesity, and physical exercise. DM was associated with an increased risk of CC for both men (summary RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.30-1.57; n=11 studies) and women (summary RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.14-1.53; n=10 studies). For RC, there was a significant association between DM and cancer risk for men (summary RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.40; n=8 studies), but not for women (summary RR 1.09, 95% CI=0.99-1.19; n=8 studies).
conclusionsThese data suggest that DM is an independent risk factor for colon and rectal cancer. Although these findings are based on observational epidemiological studies that have inherent limitations due to diagnostic bias and confounding, subgroup analyses confirmed the consistency of our findings across study type and population. This information can inform risk models and specialty society CRC screening guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.