Trial reportBMC public health2011
Student public commitment in a school-based diabetes prevention project: impact on physical health and health behavior.
Trial report in BMC public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00458029 (Studies to Treat Or Prevent Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Studies to Treat Or Prevent Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes (STOPP-T2D) Middle-School Based Primary Prevention Trial (HEALTHY)
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using Health Education to Address Student Physical Activity and Nutrition: Evidence and Implications to Advance Practice.The Journal of school health · 2023Pooled it
- Physical Activity and Physical Fitness among University Students-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Interventions for preventing obesity in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- What childhood obesity prevention programmes work? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2015Pooled it
- The WHO Health Promoting School framework for improving the health and well-being of students and their academic achievement.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Proof-of-Concept Feasibility Trial of a Dissonance-Based Sun Safety Intervention for Young Adult Tanners.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2022Trial
- Physical Fitness and Physical Activity in Young Adults: A Comparative Study Between Two Higher Education Institutions.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Coordinated Approach: Comprehensive Policy and Action Planning.The Journal of school health · 2023Review
- Use of Focus Groups to Inform a New Community-Based Youth Diabetes Prevention Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Implementation of School Diabetes Care in the United States: A Scoping Review.The Journal of school nursing : the official publication of the National Association of School Nurses · 2022Article
- Shifting From Tokenism to Meaningful Adolescent Participation in Research for Obesity Prevention: A Systematic Scoping Review.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Youth Peer Led Lifestyle Modification Interventions: A Narrative Literature Review.Evaluation and program planning · 2020Review
- Tobacco-Free Duo Adult-Child Contract for Prevention of Tobacco Use Among Adolescents and Parents: Protocol for a Mixed-Design Evaluation.JMIR research protocols · 2020Article
- Improving urban environment through public commitment toward the implementation of clean and healthy living behaviors.Psychology research and behavior management · 2017Article
- Article
- Health promotion for adolescent childhood leukemia survivors: building on prevention science and ehealth.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2013Review
- Prevention of overweight and obesity in children and youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CMAJ openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs concern about youth obesity continues to mount, there is increasing consideration of widespread policy changes to support improved nutritional and enhanced physical activity offerings in schools. A critical element in the success of such programs may be to involve students as spokespeople for the program. Making such a public commitment to healthy lifestyle program targets (improved nutrition and enhanced physical activity) may potentiate healthy behavior changes among such students and provide a model for their peers. This paper examines whether student's "public commitment"--voluntary participation as a peer communicator or in student-generated media opportunities--in a school-based intervention to prevent diabetes and reduce obesity predicted improved study outcomes including reduced obesity and improved health behaviors.
methodsSecondary analysis of data from a 3-year randomized controlled trial conducted in 42 middle schools examining the impact of a multi-component school-based program on body mass index (BMI) and student health behaviors. A total of 4603 students were assessed at the beginning of sixth grade and the end of eighth grade. Process evaluation data were collected throughout the course of the intervention. All analyses were adjusted for students' baseline values. For this paper, the students in the schools randomized to receive the intervention were further divided into two groups: those who participated in public commitment activities and those who did not. Students from comparable schools randomized to the assessment condition constituted the control group.
resultsWe found a lower percentage of obesity (greater than or equal to the 95th percentile for BMI) at the end of the study among the group participating in public commitment activities compared to the control group (21.5% vs. 26.6%, p = 0.02). The difference in obesity rates at the end of the study was even greater among the subgroup of students who were overweight or obese at baseline; 44.6% for the "public commitment" group, versus 53.2% for the control group (p = 0.01). There was no difference in obesity rates between the group not participating in public commitment activities and the control group (26.4% vs. 26.6%).
conclusionsParticipating in public commitment activities during the HEALTHY study may have potentiated the changes promoted by the behavioral, nutrition, and physical activity intervention components.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00458029.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.