Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22057274›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2012

Plasticity in interactions of fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) N terminus with FGF receptors underlies promiscuity of FGF1.

Andrew Beenken, Anna V Eliseenkova, Omar A Ibrahimi, Shaun K Olsen, Moosa Mohammadi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Structural Biology of the FGF7 Subfamily.Frontiers in genetics · 2019
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew BeenkenDepartment of Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA.
Anna V Eliseenkova
Omar A Ibrahimi
Shaun K Olsen
Moosa Mohammadi
New York University · US

Funding

MECHANISMS OF FGF RECEPTOR REGULATION AND SIGNALINGR01DE013686 · NIDCR · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MOHAMMADI, MOOSA · 2000 to 2020
$12.3M
Training in Pharmacological SciencesT32GM066704 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BACH, ERIKA A · 2004 to 2018
$2.6M
NIDCR NIH HHS DE13686NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE013686NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM066704PHS HHS P30 N5050276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue-specific alternative splicing in the second half of Ig-like domain 3 (D3) of fibroblast growth factor receptors 1-3 (FGFR1 to -3) generates epithelial FGFR1b-FGFR3b and mesenchymal FGFR1c-FGFR3c splice isoforms. This splicing event establishes a selectivity filter to restrict the ligand binding specificity of FGFRb and FGFRc isoforms to mesenchymally and epithelially derived fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), respectively. FGF1 is termed the "universal FGFR ligand" because it overrides this specificity barrier. To elucidate the molecular basis for FGF1 cross-reactivity with the "b" and "c" splice isoforms of FGFRs, we determined the first crystal structure of FGF1 in complex with an FGFRb isoform, FGFR2b, at 2.1 Å resolution. Comparison of the FGF1-FGFR2b structure with the three previously published FGF1-FGFRc structures reveals that plasticity in the interactions of the N-terminal region of FGF1 with FGFR D3 is the main determinant of FGF1 cross-reactivity with both isoforms of FGFRs. In support of our structural data, we demonstrate that substitution of three N-terminal residues (Gly-19, His-25, and Phe-26) of FGF2 (a ligand that does not bind FGFR2b) for the corresponding residues of FGF1 (Phe-16, Asn-22, and Tyr-23) enables the FGF2 triple mutant to bind and activate FGFR2b. These findings taken together with our previous structural data on receptor binding specificity of FGF2, FGF8, and FGF10 conclusively show that sequence divergence at the N termini of FGFs is the primary regulator of the receptor binding specificity and promiscuity of FGFs.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionCrystallography, X-RayFibroblast Growth Factor 1HumansMutation, MissenseProtein BindingProtein IsoformsProtein Structure, QuaternaryProtein Structure, TertiaryReceptors, Fibroblast Growth FactorStructure-Activity RelationshipFibroblast Growth Factor 1Protein IsoformsReceptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor

Identifiers

PMID22057274
PMCPMC3270963
OpenAlexW2074537683

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.