ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2012
Epigenetic priors for identifying active transcription factor binding sites.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed.
- Schizophrenia risk variants modulate transcription factor binding and gene expression in cortical cell types.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Article
- KnowYourCG: Facilitating base-level sparse methylome interpretation.Science advances · 2025Article
- The pioneer transcription factor Zelda controls the exit from regeneration and restoration of patterning inScience advances · 2025Article
- Genomic analysis of progenitors in viral infection implicates glucocorticoids as suppressors of plasmacytoid dendritic cell generation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Vps34-orchestrated lipid signaling processes regulate the transitional heterogeneity and functional adaptation of effector regulatory T cells.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- A cardiac transcriptional enhancer is repurposed during regeneration to activate an anti-proliferative program.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- Genome-wide characterization of the GmLUX binding preferences and its epigenic features in the soybean genome.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Article
- Profiling the quantitative occupancy of myriad transcription factors across conditions by modeling chromatin accessibility data.Genome research · 2022Article
- CTCF: an R/bioconductor data package of human and mouse CTCF binding sites.Bioinformatics advances · 2022Article
- Identification and initial characterization of POLIII-driven transcripts by msRNA-sequencing.RNA biology · 2021Article
- LncRNA KCNQ1OT1 activated by c-Myc promotes cell proliferation via interacting with FUS to stabilize MAP3K1 in acute promyelocytic leukemia.Cell death & disease · 2021Article
- Nitrate-induced CLE35 signaling peptides inhibit nodulation through the SUNN receptor and miR2111 repression.Plant physiology · 2021Article
- Chromatin information content landscapes inform transcription factor and DNA interactions.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Introducing the ArsR-Regulated Arsenic Stimulon.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Interrogating the Accessible Chromatin Landscape of Eukaryote Genomes Using ATAC-seq.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Review
- Reconstructing the maize leaf regulatory network using ChIP-seq data of 104 transcription factors.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Atlas of Transcription Factor Binding Sites from ENCODE DNase Hypersensitivity Data across 27 Tissue Types.Cell reports · 2020Article
- A comprehensive review of computational prediction of genome-wide features.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Article
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAccurate knowledge of the genome-wide binding of transcription factors in a particular cell type or under a particular condition is necessary for understanding transcriptional regulation. Using epigenetic data such as histone modification and DNase I, accessibility data has been shown to improve motif-based in silico methods for predicting such binding, but this approach has not yet been fully explored.
resultsWe describe a probabilistic method for combining one or more tracks of epigenetic data with a standard DNA sequence motif model to improve our ability to identify active transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs). We convert each data type into a position-specific probabilistic prior and combine these priors with a traditional probabilistic motif model to compute a log-posterior odds score. Our experiments, using histone modifications H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K9ac and H3K27ac, as well as DNase I sensitivity, show conclusively that the log-posterior odds score consistently outperforms a simple binary filter based on the same data. We also show that our approach performs competitively with a more complex method, CENTIPEDE, and suggest that the relative simplicity of the log-posterior odds scoring method makes it an appealing and very general method for identifying functional TFBSs on the basis of DNA and epigenetic evidence. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: FIMO, part of the MEME Suite software toolkit, now supports log-posterior odds scoring using position-specific priors for motif search. A web server and source code are available at http://meme.nbcr.net. Utilities for creating priors are at http://research.imb.uq.edu.au/t.bailey/SD/Cuellar2011. CONTACT: t.bailey@uq.edu.au SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.