Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22156231›Full record

Trial reportHealth education research2012

Process evaluation results from the HEALTHY physical education intervention.

William J Hall, Abigail Zeveloff, Allan Steckler, Margaret Schneider, Deborah Thompson, Trang Pham, Stella L Volpe, Katie Hindes, Adriana Sleigh, Robert G McMurray and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health education research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Obesity prevention and the Health promoting Schools framework: essential components and barriers to success.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Impact on Physical Fitness of the Chinese CHAMPS: A Clustered Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Intervention fidelity in a school-based diet and physical activity intervention in the UK: Active for Life Year 5.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2015
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

William J HallSchool of Nursing.chool of Social Work, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. wjhall@email.unc.edu
Abigail Zeveloff
Allan Steckler
Margaret Schneider
Deborah Thompson
Trang Pham
Stella L Volpe
Katie Hindes
Adriana Sleigh
Robert G McMurray
HEALTHY Study Group
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USChildren's Nutrition Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine · USGeorge Washington University · USIrvine University · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) StudyU01DK061230 · NIDDK · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRAFFETT, BARBARA HALINA, ZEITLER, PHILIP S. · 2001 to 2019
$231.8M
Physical Activity in Youth-Preventing Type 2 DiabetesU01DK061223 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HARRELL, JOANNE S · 2002 to 2008
$13.1M
Exercise Strategy to Prevent Pediatric Type 2 DiabetesU01DK061249 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M · 2002 to 2008
$12.4M
Middle School Prevention of Type 2 DiabetesU01DK061231 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BARANOWSKI, TOM · 2002 to 2008
$9.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061223NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061230NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061231NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061249NIDDK NIH HHS U01-DK61223NIDDK NIH HHS U01-DK61230NIDDK NIH HHS U01-DK61231NIDDK NIH HHS U01-DK61249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Process evaluation is an assessment of the implementation of an intervention. A process evaluation component was embedded in the HEALTHY study, a primary prevention trial for Type 2 diabetes implemented over 3 years in 21 middle schools across the United States. The HEALTHY physical education (PE) intervention aimed at maximizing student engagement in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity through delivery of structured lesson plans by PE teachers. Process evaluation data collected via class observations and interventionist interviews assessed fidelity, dose delivered, implementor participation, dose received and barriers. Process evaluation results indicate a high level of fidelity in implementing HEALTHY PE activities and offering 225 min of PE every 10 school days. Concerning dose delivered, students were active for approximately 33 min of class, representing an average of 61% of the class time. Results also indicate that PE teachers were generally engaged in implementing the HEALTHY PE curriculum. Data on dose received showed that students were highly engaged with the PE intervention; however, student misbehavior was the most common barrier observed during classes. Other barriers included teacher disengagement, large classes, limited gym space and poor classroom management. Findings suggest that the PE intervention was generally implemented and received as intended despite several barriers.

Indexed as

Physical Education and TrainingRisk Reduction BehaviorAdolescentChildCurriculumDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleSchoolsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID22156231
PMCPMC3303206
OpenAlexW2171301002

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.