Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22207415›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2012

Managing hypertension among nursing-home residents and community-dwelling elderly in Germany: a comparative pharmacoepidemiological study.

Sophie Lochner, Wilhelm Kirch, Christoph Schindler

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence, management and control of hypertension in older adults on admission to hospital.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophie LochnerInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Dresden, Fiedlerstrasse 27, D - 01307 Dresden, Germany. sophie.lochner@mailbox.tu-dresden.de
Wilhelm Kirch
Christoph Schindler
TU Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the adequacy of hypertension management in hypertensive elderly living in long-term-care facilities compared with home-living elderly.

methodsThis retrospective, cross-sectional, pharmacoepidemiological study compared data from a community-dwelling population (CD) and from four nursing homes (NH) in Dresden, Germany. Individuals aged ≥ 65 with the diagnosis of arterial hypertension were included. Demographical, medical, and drug prescription data as well as blood pressure (BP) values were analyzed and compared descriptively after matching the populations by age and gender.

resultsEach population comprised 209 patients (mean age 80.4 years [± 6], 70.3% women). NH showed a higher number of diseases [7 (5-9) vs. 5 (3-7); p < 0.001]. BP (<140/90 mmHg) was better controlled in NH (61.0% vs. 48.1%; p = 0.015). The median number of BP-lowering drugs was three (2-4; CD) and two (1-3; NH) (range: 0-9). Most frequently used antihypertensives were diuretics and beta-blockers. Among renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers, angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) were preferred in CD and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in NH. Drug treatment for secondary prevention of myocardial infarction or stroke [acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 100, RAS-blocker, beta-blocker, statin] was low among both groups (CD 21.3%; NH 1.6%; p = 0.01). NH received more inappropriate drugs, especially tranquillizers (31.2% vs. 21.0%; p < 0.05) [according to the PRISCUS (Latin for "old and venerable") list for potentially inappropriate medications in the elderly (PIM)].

conclusionsNH residents showed better BP control than CD elderly while receiving less antihypertensive drugs. The prescription of antihypertensives was assumed to be more cost effective in NH. Nevertheless, inappropriate drug use is still high (NH > CD), and there is an extended need for professional medication assessment in both groups of elderly.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesDiureticsDrug Therapy, CombinationDyslipidemiasFemaleGermanyGlucose Metabolism DisordersHomes for the AgedHumansAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsDiuretics

Identifiers

PMID22207415
OpenAlexW2009261984

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.