Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22216000›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2011

Joint ancestry and association testing in admixed individuals.

Daniel Shriner, Adebowale Adeyemo, Charles N Rotimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Genome-wide association study of inhaled corticosteroid response in admixed children with asthma.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2019
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Genotypic and phenotypic consequences of domestication in dogs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Strategies for the Genomic Analysis of Admixed Populations.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel ShrinerCenter for Research on Genomics and Global Health, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America. shrinerda@mail.nih.gov
Adebowale Adeyemo
Charles N Rotimi

Funding

Genetic epidemiology of complex diseasesZIAHG200362 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ROTIMI, CHARLES · 2009 to 2025
$54.7M
UVDM01RR010284 · NCRR · HOWARD UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, WILLIAM ROBERT · 1996 to 2010
$17.4M
The Howard University SCORE Program Supplemental GrantS06GM008016 · NIGMS · HOWARD UNIVERSITY · PI LITTLETON, GEORGE K · 1989 to 2009
$16.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200362NCRR NIH HHS 2M01RR010284NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR010284NIGMS NIH HHS S06GM008016-320107NIGMS NIH HHS S06GM008016-380111PHS HHS 1ZIAHG200362-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For samples of admixed individuals, it is possible to test for both ancestry effects via admixture mapping and genotype effects via association mapping. Here, we describe a joint test called BMIX that combines admixture and association statistics at single markers. We first perform high-density admixture mapping using local ancestry. We then perform association mapping using stratified regression, wherein for each marker genotypes are stratified by local ancestry. In both stages, we use generalized linear models, providing the advantage that the joint test can be used with any phenotype distribution with an appropriate link function. To define the alternative densities for admixture mapping and association mapping, we describe a method based on autocorrelation to empirically estimate the testing burdens of admixture mapping and association mapping. We then describe a joint test that uses the posterior probabilities from admixture mapping as prior probabilities for association mapping, capitalizing on the reduced testing burden of admixture mapping relative to association mapping. By simulation, we show that BMIX is potentially orders-of-magnitude more powerful than the MIX score, which is currently the most powerful frequentist joint test. We illustrate the gain in power through analysis of fasting plasma glucose among 922 unrelated, non-diabetic, admixed African Americans from the Howard University Family Study. We detected loci at 1q24 and 6q26 as genome-wide significant via admixture mapping; both loci have been independently reported from linkage analysis. Using the association data, we resolved the 1q24 signal into two regions. One region, upstream of the gene FAM78B, contains three binding sites for the transcription factor PPARG and two binding sites for HNF1A, both previously implicated in the pathology of type 2 diabetes. The fact that both loci showed ancestry effects may provide novel insight into the genetic architecture of fasting plasma glucose in individuals of African ancestry.

Indexed as

Genetic LinkageBayes TheoremBlack or African AmericanChromosome MappingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Genetics, PopulationGenotypeHumansLinkage DisequilibriumPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID22216000
PMCPMC3245293

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.