Trial reportJournal of diabetes science and technology2011
Precision, accuracy, and user acceptance of the OneTouch SelectSimple blood glucose monitoring system.
Trial report in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mouth Rinsing with Maltodextrin Solutions Fails to Improve Time Trial Endurance Cycling Performance in Recreational Athletes.Nutrients · 2016Trial
- A randomized controlled trial comparing health and quality of life of lung transplant recipients following nurse and computer-based triage utilizing home spirometry monitoring.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2013Trial
- System accuracy evaluation of the new blood glucose monitoring meter "GLUCOCARD S onyx" beyond ISO 15197:2013/EN ISO 15197:2015 requirements and with new patient safety features.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2025Article
- Incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in persons living with HIV initiated on dolutegravir-based antiretroviral regimen in Ghana: an observational longitudinal study.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2024Observational
- Assessment of Serum Free Light Chains as a Marker of Diabetic Nephropathy; A Cross-Sectional Study in the Kumasi Metropolis.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2022Article
- Article
- System accuracy evaluation of 18 CE-marked current-generation blood glucose monitoring systems based on EN ISO 15197:2015.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2020Article
- Radio-Frequency and Microwave Techniques for Non-Invasive Measurement of Blood Glucose Levels.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Comparative Evaluations of Randomly Selected Four Point-of-Care Glucometer Devices in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2018Article
- Analysis of the performance of the OneTouch SelectSimple blood glucose monitoring system: why ease of use studies need to be part of accuracy studies.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe OneTouch® SelectSimple™ blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) is a device for self-monitoring of blood glucose designed for ease of use. Alarms alert subjects to low [20-69 mg/dl (1.1-3.8 mmol/liter)], high [180-239 mg/dl (9.9-13.2 mmol/liter)], and very high [240-600 mg/dl (13.3-33.1 mmol/liter)] blood glucose readings.
methodsRepeatability in blood and intermediate precision with aqueous controls were examined using blood from one donor adjusted to different glucose concentrations, and tested with 10 meters and 1 test-strip lot. System accuracy was evaluated with blood samples from 100 diabetes patients tested on 3 test-strip lots, compared with a reference system (YSI 2300 STAT). To test user accuracy, patients (n = 156) and health care professionals (HCPs) tested subject blood with the SelectSimple twice. Health care professionals evaluated subject BGMS technique after a 3-5 day home-testing period. Users evaluated the instructions for use and responded to a user acceptance questionnaire.
resultsIn repeatability and intermediate precision testing, the SelectSimple BGMS had a coefficient of variation of ≤ 5% or standard deviation of ≤ 5 mg/dl. In the clinical accuracy study, 100% of measurements <75 mg/dl (4.2 mmol/liter) were within ± 15 mg/dl (0.8 mmol/liter) of reference value, and 99.6% of measurements ≥ 75 mg/dl (4.2 mmol/liter) were within ±20%. Patients were able to use the BGMS appropriately and evaluated it as easy to use. Acceptance of the SelectSimple BGMS was within predefined limits.
conclusionsIn these studies, the SelectSimple BGMS met all criteria for precision, system, and user accuracy, was easy to use, and was well accepted by patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.