ReviewVascular health and risk management2011
Differential clinical profile of candesartan compared to other angiotensin receptor blockers.
Review in Vascular health and risk management, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase I Non-Randomized, Unblinded, Single-Center Trial of Oral Telmisartan Alone or Combined With Selected Standard of Care Therapies for Prostate Cancer
Phase II Non-Randomized, Unblinded, Single-Center Trial of Telmisartan in Combination With Cytotoxic Regimens in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer Versus Historical Best Supportive Care
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of candesartan cilexetil tablet in Chinese volunteers under fasting condition: an open-label, randomized-sequence, 2-period crossover study.Translational and clinical pharmacology · 2024Article
- Article
- Effect of Azilsartan on clinical blood pressure reduction compared to other angiotensin receptor blockers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Different responses of the MIO‑M1 Mueller cell line to angiotensin II under hyperglycemic or hypoxic conditions.Biomedical reports · 2023Article
- Determination of candesartan or olmesartan in hypertensive patient plasma using UPLC-MS/MS.Translational and clinical pharmacology · 2021Article
- Real world effectiveness and tolerability of candesartan in the treatment of migraine: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- The renin-angiotensin system: a possible new target for depression.BMC medicine · 2017Review
- Neurorestoration after traumatic brain injury through angiotensin II receptor blockage.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2015Article
- The renin-angiotensin system and prevention of age-related functional decline: where are we now?Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2015Review
- Candesartan cilexetil 32 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg in unselected patients with high or very high cardiovascular risk: efficacy, safety, and metabolic impact.Clinical drug investigation · 2014Observational
- The place of ARBs in heart failure therapy: is aldosterone suppression the key?Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advantages of blood pressure (BP) control on the risks of heart failure and stroke are well established. The renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in volume homeostasis and BP regulation and is a target for several groups of antihypertensive drugs. Angiotensin II receptor blockers represent a major class of antihypertensive compounds. Candesartan cilexetil is an angiotensin II type 1 (AT[1]) receptor antagonist (angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]) that inhibits the actions of angiotensin II on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Oral candesartan 8-32 mg once daily is recommended for the treatment of adult patients with hypertension. Clinical trials have demonstrated that candesartan cilexetil is an effective agent in reducing the risk of cardiovascular mortality, stroke, heart failure, arterial stiffness, renal failure, retinopathy, and migraine in different populations of adult patients including patients with coexisting type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, or kidney impairment. Clinical evidence confirmed that candesartan cilexetil provides better antihypertensive efficacy than losartan and is at least as effective as telmisartan and valsartan. Candesartan cilexetil, one of the current market leaders in BP treatment, is a highly selective compound with high potency, a long duration of action, and a tolerability profile similar to placebo. The most important and recent data from clinical trials regarding candesartan cilexetil will be reviewed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.