Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22311595›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2012

Current state of diagnosis and management of critical limb ischemia.

Dan Clair, Samir Shah, John Weber

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A universal drug delivery catheter for the treatment of infrapopliteal arterial disease using liquid therapy.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Management of critical limb ischemia.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dan ClairDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. CLAIRD@ccf.org
Samir Shah
John Weber

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical limb ischemia represents the most severe form of peripheral arterial disease and carries with it severe morbidity and mortality risks. Because of comorbidity risks, early diagnosis and aggressive medical management make up an important part of the treatment paradigm for these individuals. However, in addition to managing these comorbid conditions, the physician caring for these individuals must be able to provide revascularization options that will improve arterial flow to the threatened extremity and assure healing of complicated wounds. Both open surgical and endovascular therapies have proven beneficial in restoring flow to severely ischemic limbs in these patients. Additionally, combinations of the above therapeutic methods have offered more available options for these patients. This article reviews care of patients with critical limb ischemia with critical assessment of options for medical and revascularization options.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalAngiographyChronic PainComorbidityCritical CareCritical IllnessFemaleHumansIschemiaIschemic PostconditioningLimb SalvageLower ExtremityMalePeripheral Arterial DiseasePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsSmoking CessationPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.