Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22467997›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2011

Correcting for Population Stratification in Genomewide Association Studies.

D Y Lin, D Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Calibrated and Conformal Propensity Scores for Causal Effect Estimation.Uncertainty in artificial intelligence : proceedings of the ... conference. Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Analyzing genetic association studies with an extended propensity score approach.Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D Y LinDepartment of Biostatistics, CB#7420, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7420.
D Zeng

Funding

STATISTICAL METHODS IN CURRENT CANCER RESEARCHR01CA082659 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIN, DANYU · 2000 to 2016
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA082659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomewide association studies have become the primary tool for discovering the genetic basis of complex human diseases. Such studies are susceptible to the confounding effects of population stratification, in that the combination of allele-frequency heterogeneity with disease-risk heterogeneity among different ancestral subpopulations can induce spurious associations between genetic variants and disease. This article provides a statistically rigorous and computationally feasible solution to this challenging problem of unmeasured confounders. We show that the odds ratio of disease with a genetic variant is identifiable if and only if the genotype is independent of the unknown population substructure conditional on a set of observed ancestry-informative markers in the disease-free population. Under this condition, the odds ratio of interest can be estimated by fitting a semiparametric logistic regression model with an arbitrary function of a propensity score relating the genotype probability to ancestry-informative markers. Approximating the unknown function of the propensity score by B-splines, we derive a consistent and asymptotically normal estimator for the odds ratio of interest with a consistent variance estimator. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed inference procedures perform well in realistic settings. An application to the well-known Wellcome Trust Case-Control Study is presented. Supplemental materials are available online.

Identifiers

PMID22467997
PMCPMC3314247

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.