Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22491877›Full record

SynthesisHNO2012

[Randomized controlled trials in the surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea].

J U Sommer, J T Maurer, K Hörmann, B A Stuck

Abstract readEnglish AbstractMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in HNO, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J U SommerUniversitäts-HNO-Klinik Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, 68135, Mannheim, Deutschland. ulrich.sommer@umm.de
J T Maurer
K Hörmann
B A Stuck

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for surgical treatment alternatives for obstructive sleep apnea is unchanged. However, recommendations regarding these treatments can often only be given with caution as there are only a limited number of controlled studies available. To perform controlled trials and even more so placebo controlled trials in the field of sleep surgery is challenging, especially in comparison to studies evaluating conservative approaches. Nevertheless, these studies can be carried out also in the field of sleep surgery. In this review we present recent concepts and high-quality surgical trials with innovative study designs. A Medline search revealed 310 studies regarding surgical treatment of sleep apnea. These studies were assessed regarding quality, execution and number of subjects. A total of 12 randomized controlled studies were identified addressing palatal implants, radio-frequency surgery, nasal surgery, maxillomandibular advancement and laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty (LAUP). Furthermore this review addresses the limitations of surgical studies and the differences compared to trials dealing with conservative approaches. The studies presented in this review demonstrate that high-quality trials regarding surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea are feasible and can lead to recommendations with high evidence levels.

Indexed as

HumansOtorhinolaryngologic Surgical ProceduresPrevalenceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSleep Apnea, ObstructiveTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.