Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22555407›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)2012

Functional primate genomics--leveraging the medical potential.

Wolfgang Enard

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. On the apparent rarity of epithelial cancers in captive chimpanzees.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  9. Comparative genomics of brain size evolution.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Wolfgang EnardMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. enard@eva.mpg.de

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within biomedicine, comparative genomics is crucial for interpreting human genetic variants and building proper animal models. As our closest relatives, primates are of particular relevance in this frame work. Here, I review principles and concrete examples of this approach. Since one can expect that generating the necessary genomic DNA sequences will not be the major limiting factor in the near future, I argue that in analogy to human biomedicine, comprehensive phenotyping of different primates will be a crucial next step to tap the full potential of comparative genomics. Especially the possibility to generate pluripotent stem cells from primates should allow extending the comparative approach to many medically relevant questions.

Indexed as

MedicineAnimalsBiological EvolutionGenome, HumanGenomicsHumansPrimatesSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.