Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22645558›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2011

Evidence for a DNA-Based Mechanism of Intron-Mediated Enhancement.

Alan B Rose, Shahram Emami, Keith Bradnam, Ian Korf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The regulatory genome of the malaria vectorNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of UTR-Introns ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alan B RoseMolecular and Cellular Biology, University of California Davis, CA, USA.
Shahram Emami
Keith Bradnam
Ian Korf
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

COMPARATIVE GENOMICS AND GENE PREDICTIONK22HG000064 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KORF, IAN F · 2001 to 2006
$1.1M
MINORITY PREDOCTORAL FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM--NIGMSF31HG000064 · NHGRI · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI ACAKPO-SATCHIVI, LESLIE J · 1991 to 1995
–
NHGRI NIH HHS F31 HG000064NHGRI NIH HHS K22 HG000064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many introns significantly increase gene expression through a process termed intron-mediated enhancement (IME). Introns exist in the transcribed DNA and the nascent RNA, and could affect expression from either location. To determine which is more relevant to IME, hybrid introns were constructed that contain sequences from stimulating Arabidopsis thaliana introns either in their normal orientation or as the reverse complement. Both ends of each intron are from the non-stimulatory COR15a intron in their normal orientation to allow splicing. The inversions create major alterations to the sequence of the transcribed RNA with relatively minor changes to the DNA structure. Introns containing portions of either the UBQ10 or ATPK1 intron increased expression to a similar degree regardless of orientation. Also, computational predictions of IME improve when both intron strands are considered. These findings are more consistent with models of IME that act at the level of DNA rather than RNA.

Indexed as

Arabidopsisgene expressionintron-mediated enhancement

Identifiers

PMID22645558
PMCPMC3355757
OpenAlexW2132051679

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.