ArticleAmerican journal of hypertension2012
Feasibility and reproducibility of noninvasive 24-h ambulatory aortic blood pressure monitoring with a brachial cuff-based oscillometric device.
Article in American journal of hypertension, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Study of the Effects of Dapagliflozin on Ambulatory Aortic Pressure, Arterial Stiffness and Urine Albumin Excretion in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Longitudinal Change of Arterial Stiffness Indices in Relation to Ambulatory Aortic and Branchial Pressure in Long Term Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Twenty-Four-Hour Pulsatile Hemodynamics Predict Brachial Blood Pressure Response to Renal Denervation in the SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Trial.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Effect of supine versus sitting position on noninvasive assessment of aortic pressure waveform: a randomized cross-over study.Journal of human hypertension · 2014Trial
- Trial
- Clinical decision guidance by an automated, brachial cuff-based cardiac output assessment in patients with shock under treatment: a pilot study in Athens, Greece.Acute and critical care · 2025Article
- 24-hour isolated aortic systolic hypertension phenotype and its association with carotid and cardiac damage: the SAFAR study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
- Comparison of Influence of Office and 24-h Central Aortic Blood Pressure on Target Organ Damage in Hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
- Another step forward in the introduction of aortic systolic blood pressure assessment into clinical practice?Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024Article
- 24-h central pressure is a valuable predictor for left ventricular hypertrophy in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024Article
- Twenty-Four-Hour Central (Aortic) Systolic Blood Pressure: Reference Values and Dipping Patterns in Untreated Individuals.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2022Article
- Disparate Associations of 24-h Central Aortic and Brachial Cuff Blood Pressure With Hypertension-Mediated Organ Damage and Cardiovascular Risk.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Associations between Intrinsic Heart Rate, P Wave and QT Interval Durations and Pulse Wave Analysis in Patients with Hypertension and High Normal Blood Pressure.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Comparison of 24-Hour Ambulatory Central Blood Pressure Reduction Efficacy Between Fixed Amlodipine or Up-Titrated Hydrochlorothiazide Plus Losartan: The K-Central Study.American journal of hypertension · 2019Article
- Ambulatory blood pressure and arterial stiffness web-based telemonitoring in patients at cardiovascular risk. First results of the VASOTENS (Vascular health ASsessment Of The hypertENSive patients) Registry.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019Observational
- Ambulatory arterial stiffness evaluation: A step forward in the management of hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019Article
- Parameters of arterial stiffness in patients with Behçet's disease and their relationship with disease duration.Rheumatology international · 2019Article
- Effect of Nebivolol and Olmesartan on 24-Hour Brachial and Aortic Blood Pressure in the Acute Stage of Ischemic Stroke.International journal of hypertension · 2019Article
- Early vascular parameters in the micro- and macrocirculation in type 2 diabetes.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2018Article
- 24-hour aortic blood pressure variability showed a stronger association with carotid damage than 24-hour brachial blood pressure variability: The SAFAR study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018Article
- Renal denervation improves 24-hour central and peripheral blood pressures, arterial stiffness, and peripheral resistance.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccumulating evidence suggests the potential superiority of office aortic blood pressure (BP) over brachial in the management of arterial hypertension. The noninvasive aortic 24-h ambulatory brachial BP monitoring (ABPM) is potentially the optimal method for assessing BP profile. The objective of the present study was to investigate the feasibility and reproducibility to perform noninvasively 24-h aortic ABPM with a novel validated brachial cuff-based automatic oscillometric device (Mobilo-O-Graph) which records brachial BP and waveforms and assesses aortic BP via mathematical transformation.
methodsThirty consecutive subjects (mean age: 53.6 ± 11.6 years, 17 men) had a test-retest ABPM with at least 1-week interval. No modification of vasoactive drug treatment during the interval was allowed while similar 24-h activity during both recording days was recommended.
resultsThe average number of valid readings for brachial vs. aortic BP were 69.9 ± 10.4 vs. 58.0 ± 13.3 in the initial 24-h assessment (P < 0.001) and 68.3 ± 10.8 vs. 56.4 ± 13.6 in the repeat assessment (P < 0.001). No differences in average 24 h aortic BP values were observed between the two assessments (systolic blood pressure (SBP) 115.9 ± 7.7 vs. 115.1 ± 6.0 mm Hg, respectively, P = 0.48, and diastolic 79.7 ± 7.4 vs. 79.2 ± 8.7, P = 0.54). Reproducibility indices of aortic pressure including, intraclass coefficient of variation (SBP: 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.58-0.90); diastolic: 0.92 (0.83-0.96)) and s.d. of differences (SBP/diastolic: 6.0/4.5 mm Hg) indicated acceptable reproducibility. The Bland-Altman plots indicated no evidence of systemic bias.
conclusionsIn conclusion, these data suggest that noninvasive 24-h ABPM is feasible and provides reproducible values. Future studies should validate the prognostic ability of 24-h aortic hemodynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.